The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Offline Showrooms in Omnichannel Retail: Demand and Operational Benefits
Open accessAbstract
Omnichannel environments where customers shop online and offline at the same retailer are ubiquitous, and are deployed by online-first and traditional retailers alike. We focus on the relatively understudied domain of online-first retailers and the engagement of a key omnichannel tactic; specifically, introduction of showrooms (physical locations where customers can view and try products) in combination with online fulfillment that uses centralized inventory management. We ask whether, and if so, how, showrooms benefit the two most basic retail objectives: demand generation and operational efficiency. Using quasi-experimental data on showroom openings by WarbyParker.com , the leading and iconic online-first eyewear retailer, we find that showrooms: (1) increase demand overall and in the online channel as well; (2) generate operational spillovers to the other channels by attracting customers who, on average, have a higher cost-to-serve; (3) improve overall operational efficiency by increasing conversion in a sampling channel and by decreasing returns; and (4) amplify these demand and operational benefits in dealing with customers who have the most acute need for the firm’s products. Moreover, the effects we document strengthen with time as showrooms contribute not only to brand awareness but also to what we term channel awareness as well. We conclude by elaborating the underlying customer dynamics driving our findings and by offering implications for how online-first retailers might deploy omnichannel tactics. This paper was accepted by Vishal Gaur, operations management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j72 · Cited by 5,051
Hirano, K., & Imbens, G. W. (2001) · Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1023/a:1020371312283 · Cited by 1,039
Instruments for Causal Inference: An Epidemiologist's Dream?
Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2006) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000222409.00878.37 · Cited by 961
Adding Bricks to Clicks: Predicting the Patterns of Cross-Channel Elasticities over Time
Avery, J., Steenburgh, T. J., Deighton, J., & Caravella, M. (2012) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.09.0081 · Cited by 533
Return policies and the optimal level of “hassle”
Davis, S., Hagerty, M., & Gerstner, E. (1998) · Journal of Economics and Business · doi:10.1016/s0148-6195(98)00013-7 · Cited by 273
Cited by
Selling the Extraordinary in Experiential Retail Stores
Jahn, S., Nierobisch, T., Toporowski, W., & Dannewald, T. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/698330 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, D. R., Gallino, S., & Moreno, A.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1629-1651
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3123725440
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 83.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Offline Showrooms in Omnichannel Retail: Demand and Operational Benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2684
- The paper
- Bell, D. R., Gallino, S., & Moreno, A. (2018). Offline Showrooms in Omnichannel Retail: Demand and Operational Benefits. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2684
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.