Cited by 368Big Data and Business IntelligenceFirm Innovation and GrowthInnovation and Knowledge Management

Data Analytics, Innovation, and Firm Productivity

Open access
Wu, Lynn, Hitt, Lorin, Lou, Bowen·2020·Management Science

Abstract

We examine the relationship between data analytics capabilities and innovation using detailed firm-level data. To measure innovation, we first utilize a survey to capture two types of firm practices, process improvement and new technology development for 331 firms. We then use patent data to further analyze new technology development for a broader sample of more than 2,000 publicly traded firms. We find that data analytics capabilities are more likely to be present and are more valuable in firms that are oriented around process improvement and that create new technologies by combining a diverse set of existing technologies than they are in firms that are focused on generating entirely new technologies. These results are consistent with the theory that data analytics are complementary to certain types of innovation because they enable firms to expand the search space of existing knowledge to combine into new technologies, as well as the theoretical arguments that data analytics support incremental process improvements. Data analytics appears less effective for developing entirely new technologies or creating combinations involving a few areas of knowledge, innovative approaches where there is either limited data or limited value in integrating diverse knowledge. Overall, our results suggest that firms that have historically focused on specific types of innovation—process innovation and innovation by diverse recombination—may receive the most benefits from using data analytics. This paper was accepted by Chris Forman, information systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3281

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data-driven decisions and analytics capabilities are particularly valuable to organizations in terms of fostering process innovation, supply chain design management, knowledge management and quality of decision-making.

    “Indeed, data-driven decisions and analytics capabilities are particularly valuable to organizations in terms of fostering process innovation (Wu, Hitt and Lou, 2020;Wu, Lou and Hitt, 2019), supply chain design management (e.g.Waller and Fawcett, 2013), knowledge management (Khan and Vorley, 2017) and quality of decision-making (cf.Shamim et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wu, L., Hitt, L., & Lou, B.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Management Science
Published
2020-05
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
2017-2039
ISSN
  • 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5501
OpenAlex
W2980544481
Cited by
368
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
16.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Management Science (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
data analytics capability, innovation, firm productivity, process improvement, new technology development, patent information, knowledge recombination, incremental innovation, complementary assets, technological diversification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review