The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data Analytics Supports Decentralized Innovation
Open accessAbstract
Data-analytics technology can accelerate the innovation process by enabling existing knowledge to be identified, accessed, combined, and deployed to address new problem domains. However, like prior advances in information technology, the ability of firms to exploit these opportunities depends on a variety of complementary human capital and organizational capabilities. We focus on whether analytics is more valuable in firms where innovation within a firm has decentralized groups of inventors or centralized ones. Our analysis draws on prior work measuring firm-analytics capability using detailed employee-level data and matches these data to metrics on intrafirm inventor networks that reveal whether a firm’s innovation structure is centralized or decentralized. In a panel of 1,864 publicly traded firms from the years 1988–2013, we find that firms with a decentralized innovation structure have a greater demand for analytics skills and receive greater productivity benefits from their analytics capabilities, consistent with a complementarity between analytics and decentralized innovation. We also find that analytics helps decentralized structures to create new combinations and reuse of existing technologies, consistent with the ability of analytics to link knowledge across diverse domains and to integrate external knowledge into the firm. Furthermore, the effect primarily comes from the analytics capabilities of the noninventor employees as opposed to inventors themselves. These results show that the benefit of analytics on innovation depends on existing organizational structures. Similar to the IT–productivity paradox, these results can help explain a contemporary analytics–innovation paradox—the apparent slowdown in innovation despite the recent increase in analytics investments. This paper was accepted by Anandhi Bharadwaj, information systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 · Cited by 22,571
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983) · doi:10.21236/ada128980 · Cited by 2,263
Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?
Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180338 · Cited by 1,002 · cited 1×
“As Bloom et al. (2017) pointed out, a decline in innovative output has been observed recently.”
The impact of information systems on organizations and markets
Gurbaxani, V., & Whang, S. (1991) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/99977.99990 · Cited by 960
The Rapid Adoption of Data-Driven Decision-Making
Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.p20161016 · Cited by 843
IBM Watson: How Cognitive Computing Can Be Applied to Big Data Challenges in Life Sciences Research
Chen, Y., Elenee Argentinis, J., & Weber, G. (2016) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.12.001 · Cited by 466
Cited by
The Robot Revolution: Managerial and Employment Consequences for Firms
Dixon, J., Hong, B., & Wu, L. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3812 · Cited by 463
Self-citationSheng, J., Amankwah‐Amoah, J., Khan, Z., & Wang, X. (2021) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12441 · Cited by 369
Lou, B., & Wu, L. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16565 · Cited by 177
Self-citationRamaul, L., Ritala, P., Kostis, A., & Aaltonen, P. (2026) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13246 · Cited by 41
How Does AI Improve Human Decision-Making? Evidence from the AI-Powered Go Program
Choi, S., Kim, N., Kim, J., & Kang, H. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3893835 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, L., Lou, B., & Hitt, L.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4863-4877
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2943548682
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 18.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data Analytics Supports Decentralized Innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3344
- The paper
- Wu, L., Lou, B., & Hitt, L. (2019). Data Analytics Supports Decentralized Innovation. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3344
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.