The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
At Your Service on the Table: Impact of Tabletop Technology on Restaurant Performance
Open accessAbstract
Some industries, such as healthcare and financial services, have reported significant productivity gains from introduction of new technologies. However, other more traditional, labor-intensive industries are lagging behind. We use granular data to examine the impact of a customer-facing technology (a tabletop device that facilitates the table service process) on the check size and meal duration aspects of restaurant performance. The restaurant chain in our study implemented tabletop devices in a staggered manner, offering us a quasi-experimental setting in which to apply a difference-in-difference technique and identify the causal effect of the technology. We find that the tabletop technology is likely to improve average sales per check by approximately 1% (95% confidence interval is from 0.8% to 1.02%), and reduce the meal duration by close to 10% (95% confidence interval ranges from −9.94% to −9.54%). The combination of these two effects increases the sales per minute or sales productivity by approximately 11%. Various robustness checks of our empirical strategy and post hoc analyses find that tabletop technology allows low-ability waiters to improve their performance more significantly than high-ability waiters. In addition, the technology does not change the staffing level. Overall, our results indicate great potential for introducing tabletop technology in a large service industry that currently lacks digitalization. This paper was accepted by Vishal Gaur, operations management.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Self-service kiosks, tabletop ordering systems, and online reservation platforms have been shown to influence customers' overall experience and their willingness to return, even though adoption across small and independent restaurants remains inconsistent (Tan & Netessine, 2020;Xu et al., 2020).”
From Restaurant Service Quality in Relation to Customer Satisfaction (2026) · cites this paper as Tan & Netessine, 2020
Citations
Cites
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- Albright S, 2014, Business Analytics: Data Analysis & Decision Making
- 10.1126/science.247.4945.920 · DOI
- 10.1162/003355302753399526 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541 · DOI
- 10.1257/jep.14.4.23 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/003465303772815736 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1066 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.90.5.1397 · DOI
- 10.1111/poms.12403 · DOI
- 10.1287/isre.12.3.304.9708 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.46.4.548.12057 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.43.12.1660 · DOI
- Gandhi P, 2016, Harvard Bus. Rev.
- 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2787 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224298905300104 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0192 · DOI
- 10.1198/016214504000000647 · DOI
- 10.2307/249475 · DOI
- 10.1177/0019793916640493 · DOI
- 10.2307/249629 · DOI
- 10.1287/msom.2015.0523 · DOI
- 10.1086/261840 · DOI
- 10.1177/0010880404270063 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0011-7315.2004.02531.x · DOI
- 10.1093/qje/qjt035 · DOI
- Landsberger HA, 1957, Hawthorne Revisited: A Plea for an Open City
- 10.1287/mnsc.46.5.597.12049 · DOI
- 10.1287/serv.2015.0105 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2523 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2695 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.99.1.112 · DOI · Paper page
- Meyer D, 2008, Setting the Table: The Transforming Power of Hospitality in Business
- 10.1086/660083 · DOI
- Mogavero D, 2016, The Underground Culinary Tour: How the New Metrics of Today’s Top Restaurants Are Transforming How America Eats
- 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300205 · DOI
- 10.1080/07421222.2015.1063281 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1760 · DOI
- 10.1287/isre.1030.0016 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.47.12.1639.10236 · DOI
- Singh S, 2015, Forbes
- Staats BR, 2016, Management Sci., 63, 1271
- 10.1287/serv.2016.0132 · DOI
- 10.1177/1938965514532170 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1950 · DOI
- 10.1177/0010880403260111 · DOI
- Thompson GM, 2007, Cornell Hospitality Report, 7, 6
- 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1187 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Restaurant Service Quality in Relation to Customer Satisfaction
Cabanday, F., & Estrosas, J. L. (2026) · The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.67167/vertex.656
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, T. F., & Netessine, S.
- Affiliations
- Southern Methodist University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tan, Tom Fangyun
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4496-4515
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3122327229
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- restaurant performance, table service, check size, meal duration, sales productivity, restaurant chains, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: At Your Service on the Table: Impact of Tabletop Technology on Restaurant Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3430
- The paper
- Tan, T. F., & Netessine, S. (2020). At Your Service on the Table: Impact of Tabletop Technology on Restaurant Performance. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3430