The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments
Abstract
The use of computer based information-decision systems to support decision making in organizations has increased significantly in the last decade. Very little effort has been devoted, however, to determine what relationships exist between the structure of information presented for decision making and the ensuing effectiveness of the decision. This article summarizes a series of experiments. The Minnesota Experiments, which were conducted to examine the significance of various information system characteristics on decision activity. Several research programs administered in the period 1970–1975 are discussed in this paper. By varying the manner in which information was provided to participants in each experiment, the impact of various information system characteristics and individual differences on decision effectiveness was investigated. Analysis of the results shows that, in many cases, the decisions/decision-making process of the participants was affected by the information system structure and/or attributes of individual decision makers. The results suggest guidelines for the designers of information systems and fruitful avenues for continued research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Actualizing organizational memory with information systems
Stein, E. W., & Zwass, V. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.85 · Cited by 843
Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition
Vessey, I., & Galletta, D. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.1.63 · Cited by 705
Person-Job Cognitive Style Fit for Software Developers: The Effect on Strain and Performance
CHILTON, M. A., HARDGRAVE, B. C., & ARMSTRONG, D. J. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045849 · Cited by 138
Computer-mediated knowledge sharing and individual user differences: an exploratory study
Taylor, W. A. (2004) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000484 · Cited by 134
Calhoun, K. J., Teng, J. T. C., & Cheon, M. J. (2002) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929021000013491 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickson, G. W., Senn, J. A., & Chervany, N. L.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1977-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 913-934
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2006783182
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.23.9.913
- The paper
- Dickson, G. W., Senn, J. A., & Chervany, N. L. (1977). Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.23.9.913
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.