The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information
Abstract
In traditional supply chain inventory management, orders are the only information firms exchange, but information technology now allows firms to share demand and inventory data quickly and inexpensively. We study the value of sharing these data in a model with one supplier, N identical retailers, and stationary stochastic consumer demand. There are inventory holding costs and back-order penalty costs. We compare a traditional information policy that does not use shared information with a full information policy that does exploit shared information. In a numerical study we find that supply chain costs are 2.2% lower on average with the full information policy than with the traditional information policy, and the maximum difference is 12.1%. We also develop a simulation-based lower bound over all feasible policies. The cost difference between the traditional information policy and the lower bound is an upper bound on the value of information sharing: In the same study, that difference is 3.4% on average, and no more than 13.8%. We contrast the value of information sharing with two other benefits of information technology, faster and cheaper order processing, which lead to shorter lead times and smaller batch sizes, respectively. In our sample, cutting lead times nearly in half reduces costs by 21% on average, and cutting batches in half reduces costs by 22% on average. For the settings we study, we conclude that implementing information technology to accelerate and smooth the physical flow of goods through a supply chain is significantly more valuable than using information technology to expand the flow of information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain
Lee, H. L., So, K. C., & Tang, C. S. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.5.626.12047 · Cited by 2,114
An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management
Diabat, A., & Govindan, K. (2011) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.002 · Cited by 938
Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability1
Melville, N. P. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721412 · Cited by 868
Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource‐based theory perspective
Barratt, M., & Oke, A. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.003 · Cited by 702
Information sharing and supply chain performance: the role of connectivity and willingness
Fawcett, S. E., Osterhaus, P., Magnan, G. M., Brau, J. C., & McCarter, M. W. (2007) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598540710776935 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Cachon, G. P., & Fisher, M.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1032-1048
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2165691491
- Cited by
- 1,839
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 59.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.46.8.1032.12029
- The paper
- Cachon, G. P., & Fisher, M. (2000). Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.8.1032.12029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.