The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design
Abstract
We examine how and why elements of organizational design depend on one another. An agent-based simulation allows us to model three design elements and two contextual variables that have rarely been analyzed jointly: a vertical hierarchy that reviews proposals from subordinates, an incentive system that rewards subordinates for departmental or firm-wide performance, the decomposition of an organization's many decisions into departments, the underlying pattern of interactions among decisions, and limits on the ability of managers to process information. Interdependencies arise among these features because of a basic, general tension. To be successful, an organization must broadly search for good sets of decisions, but it must also stabilize around good decisions once discovered. An effective organization balances search and stability. We identify sets of design elements that encourage broad search and others that promote stability. The adoption of elements that encourage broad search typically raises the marginal benefit of other elements that provide offsetting stability. Hence, the need to balance search and stability generates interdependencies among the design elements. We pay special attention to interdependencies that involve the vertical hierarchy. Our findings confirm many aspects of conventional wisdom about vertical hierarchies, but challenge or put boundary conditions on others. We place limits, for instance, on the received wisdom that firm-wide incentives and capable subordinates make top-level oversight less valuable. We also identify circumstances in which vertical hierarchies can lead to inferior long-term performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution
Kauffman, S. A. (1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195079517.001.0001 · Cited by 7,855
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257544 · Cited by 7,487
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1994) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198288787.001.0001 · Cited by 7,371
The origins of order; self organization and selection in evolution
Kauffman, S. A. (1994) · International Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0020-711x(94)90119-8 · Cited by 6,753
Designing Complex Organizations
Galbraith, J. R. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,424
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967) · Cited by 5,206
Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165852 · Cited by 4,959
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
The Architecture of Complexity
Simon, H. A. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_31 · Cited by 4,479
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Anderson P., 1999, Organ. Sci. (Special Issue), 10, 233
- Bower J. L., 1970, Managing the Resource Allocation Process
- 10.2307/256810 · DOI · Paper page
- Holmström B., 1994, Amer. Econom. Rev., 84, 972
- Milgrom P. R., 1990, Amer. Econom. Rev., 80, 511
- Mintzberg H., 1981, Harvard Bus. Rev., 81, 103
- Simon H. A., 1962, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., 106, 467
- Thompson J. D., 1967, Organizations in Action
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 · Cited by 2,431
Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0134 · Cited by 2,334
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225
Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416521003691287 · Cited by 1,659
A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research
Massa, L., Tucci, C. L., & Afuah, A. N. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0072 · Cited by 1,587
Rethinking Customer Solutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes
Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.3.1 · Cited by 1,419
Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation
Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083085 · Cited by 1,478
Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods
Davis, J., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351453 · Cited by 1,168
Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24840 · Cited by 946
Self-citationThe Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Assessment and Prospects
Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. C. (2012) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.656841 · Cited by 936
Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems
Ethiraj, S. K., & Levinthal, D. A. (2004) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0145 · Cited by 855
Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413 · Cited by 804
“…lack enough guidance to generate appropriate behaviors effi ciently (Weick, 1993; Okhuysen and Eisenhardt, 2002; Baker and Nelson, 2005), while organizations with too much structure are too constrained and lack fl exibility (Miller and Friesen, 1980; Siggelkow, 2001; Martin and Eisenhardt, 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSupply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective
Kim, Y., Chen, Y., & Linderman, K. (2014) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.006 · Cited by 817
Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: the power of analogy
Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D. A., & Rivkin, J. W. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.475 · Cited by 760
Self-citationMom, T. J. M., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0427 · Cited by 805
Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity
Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. W. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0116 · Cited by 735
Self-citationThe Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation
Lazer, D., & Friedman, A. (2007) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.52.4.667 · Cited by 696
Mom, T. J. M., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2007) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00697.x · Cited by 737
Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24870 · Cited by 953
Self-citationTrust Repair After An Organization-Level Failure
Gillespie, N. A., & Dietz, G. (2009) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.35713319 · Cited by 690
Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.401 · Cited by 680
A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes
Şimşek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x · Cited by 661
Simulation modeling in organizational and management research
Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z. “., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586485 · Cited by 660
CHANGE IN THE PRESENCE OF FIT: THE RISE, THE FALL, AND THE RENAISSANCE OF LIZ CLAIBORNE.
Siggelkow, N. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069418 · Cited by 625
Self-citationAdaptation in Vertical Relationships: Beyond Incentive Conflict
Gulati, R., Lawrence, P., & Puranam, P. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.458 · Cited by 640
Matos, S. V., & Hall, J. K. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.013 · Cited by 606
What's “New” About New Forms of Organizing?
Puranam, P., Alexy, O. T., & Reitzig, M. G. (2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0436 · Cited by 665
Yayavaram, S. K., & Ahuja, G. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.2.333 · Cited by 561
OPEN VERSUS CLOSED INNOVATION: A MODEL OF DISCOVERY AND DIVERGENCE.
Almirall, E., & Casadesus‐Masanell, R. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.45577790 · Cited by 535
Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0421 · Cited by 495
Renewing Research on Problemistic Search—A Review and Research Agenda
Posen, H. E., Keil, T. J., Kim, S., & Meissner, F. D. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0018 · Cited by 482
Perspective—Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s Past, Present, and Reconstructing for the Future
Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. C. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0277 · Cited by 472
Ennen, E., & Richter, A. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309350083 · Cited by 459
Sidhu, J. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Volberda, H. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0212 · Cited by 432
IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships
Saraf, N., Langdon, C. S., & Gosain, S. (2007) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0133 · Cited by 434
Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist?
Gilbert, C. G. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0160 · Cited by 421
Two Faces of Search: Alternative Generation and Alternative Evaluation
Knudsen, T., & Levinthal, D. A. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0216 · Cited by 411
Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty
Sommer, S. C., & Loch, C. H. (2004) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0274 · Cited by 394
A Terminal Assessment of Stages Theory: Introducing a Dynamic States Approach to Entrepreneurship
Levie, J., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2010) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.x · Cited by 386
A Self‐Tuning Model for Smart Manufacturing SMEs: Effects on Digital Innovation
Giudice, M. D., Scuotto, V., Papa, A., Tarba, S. Y., Bresciani, S., & Warkentin, M. E. (2020) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12560 · Cited by 388
Joseph, J., & Gaba, V. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0103 · Cited by 389
The Role of Accelerator Designs in Mitigating Bounded Rationality in New Ventures
Cohen, S. L., Bingham, C. B., & Hallen, B. L. (2018) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839218782131 · Cited by 361
Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration
Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2007) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0626 · Cited by 348
Self-citationEthiraj, S. K., & Levinthal, D. A. (2004) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4131441 · Cited by 339
Organizational designs and innovation streams
Tushman, M. L., Smith, W. K., Wood, R. C., Westerman, G. F., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2010) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtq040 · Cited by 363
Design Structure Matrix Extensions and Innovations: A Survey and New Opportunities
Browning, T. R. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2015.2491283 · Cited by 337
Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity
Gary, M. S., & Wood, R. E. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.899 · Cited by 341
The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography
Bercovitz, J. E. L., & Feldman, M. P. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.008 · Cited by 306
Limaj, E., & Bernroider, E. W. N. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.052 · Cited by 334
Game Changer: The Topology of Creativity
de Vaan, M., Vedres, B., & Stark, D. (2015) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/681213 · Cited by 294
Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large U.S. firms
Marquis, C., & Lee, M. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2028 · Cited by 297
Pisano, G. P. (2017) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtx026 · Cited by 293
Combining Human and Artificial Intelligence: Hybrid Problem-Solving in Organizations
Raisch, S., & Fomina, K. (2024) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2021.0421 · Cited by 378
Foundations of Entrepreneurial Strategy
Gans, J. S., Stern, S., & Wu, J. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3010 · Cited by 285
Chao, R. O., & Kavadias, S. (2008) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0828 · Cited by 283
Contextuality Within Activity Systems and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage
Porter, M. E., & Siggelkow, N. (2008) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2008.32739758 · Cited by 282
Self-citationHoping for A to Z While Rewarding Only A: Complex Organizations and Multiple Goals
Ethiraj, S. K., & Levinthal, D. A. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0358 · Cited by 292
Yayavaram, S. K., & Chen, W. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2218 · Cited by 287
Evaluating Novelty: The Role of Panels in the Selection of R&D Projects
Criscuolo, P., Dahlander, L., Grohsjean, T., & Salter, A. J. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0861 · Cited by 253
Dessein, W., & Santos, T. (2006) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/508031 · Cited by 249
Handbook of Organizational Routines
Narduzzo, A., & Warglien, M. (2008) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781848442702 · Cited by 246
Yamakawa, Y., Yang, H.-B., & Lin, Z. (2011) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.006 · Cited by 246
Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds
Csaszar, F. A. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1969 · Cited by 243
Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies
Csaszar, F. A., & Levinthal, D. A. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2440 · Cited by 248
Capturing Bottom-Up Information Technology Use Processes: A Complex Adaptive Systems Model1
Nan, N. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23044054 · Cited by 236
Reproducing Knowledge: Inaccurate Replication and Failure in Franchise Organizations
Winter, S. G., Szulanski, G., Ringov, D. P., & Jensen, R. J. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0663 · Cited by 210
A Business Model View of Strategy
Lanzolla, G., & Markides, C. (2020) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12580 · Cited by 220
Communication intensity, goal congruence, and uncertainty in buyer–supplier new product development
Yan, T., & Dooley, K. J. (2013) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.10.001 · Cited by 212
Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management
Shane, S. A. (2021) · Cited by 213
Managerial discretion and internal alignment under regulatory constraints and change
Peteraf, M. A., & Reed, R. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.628 · Cited by 208
Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure
Arora, A., Sharon Belenzon, Y., & Rios, L. A. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2098 · Cited by 203
Who Lives in the C-Suite? Organizational Structure and the Division of Labor in Top Management
Guadalupe, M., Li, H., & Wulf, J. M. (2014) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1795 · Cited by 216
Technological innovation and complexity theory
Frenken, K. (2006) · Economics of Innovation and New Technology · doi:10.1080/10438590500141453 · Cited by 197
Ganco, M., Kapoor, R., & Lee, G. K. (2019) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2017.0549 · Cited by 189
Organizational Decision Making: An Information Aggregation View
Csaszar, F. A., & Eggers, J. P. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1698 · Cited by 192
The Influence of Hierarchy on Idea Generation and Selection in the Innovation Process
Keum, D. D., & See, K. E. (2017) · Organ. Sci. · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1142 · Cited by 171
Gibbons, R. S., & Henderson, R. (2012) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400845354-019 · Cited by 228
Integration Through Incentives Within Differentiated Organizations
Kretschmer, T., & Puranam, P. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0352 · Cited by 181
Search on Rugged Landscapes: An Experimental Study
Billinger, S., Stieglitz, N., & Schumacher, T. R. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0829 · Cited by 181
Joseph, J., Klingebiel, R., & Wilson, A. J. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1076 · Cited by 187
How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth
Csaszar, F. A., & Siggelkow, N. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0477 · Cited by 176
Self-citationEffective Search in Rugged Performance Landscapes: A Review and Outlook
Baumann, O., Schmidt, J. M., & Stieglitz, N. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318808594 · Cited by 148
Modelling Bounded Rationality in Organizations: Progress and Prospects
Puranam, P., Stieglitz, N., Osman, M., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2015.1024498 · Cited by 188
Ganco, M., & Agarwal, R. (2009) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.36982618 · Cited by 177
Opportunity Spaces in Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Large Samples of Ideas
Kornish, L. J., & Ulrich, K. T. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1247 · Cited by 177
Greve, H. R. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199846740-0052 · Cited by 179
Revisiting James March (1991): Whither exploration and exploitation?
Wilden, R., Hohberger, J., Devinney, T. M., & Lavie, D. (2018) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127018765031 · Cited by 177
The science of organizational design: fit between structure and coordination
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (2018) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1186/s41469-018-0029-2 · Cited by 226
Exploring Uncharted Territory: Knowledge Search Processes in the Origination of Outlier Innovation
Kneeland, M. K., Schilling, M. A., & Aharonson, B. S. (2019) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1328 · Cited by 168
Myopia of Selection: Does Organizational Adaptation Limit the Efficacy of Population Selection?
Levinthal, D. A., & Posen, H. E. (2007) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.52.4.586 · Cited by 160
Hierarchical Structure and Search in Complex Organizations
Mihm, J., Loch, C. H., Wilkinson, D., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1148 · Cited by 154
Reconsideration of the Winner-Take-All Hypothesis: Complex Networks and Local Bias
Lee, E., Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0571 · Cited by 157
Searching, Shaping, and the Quest for Superior Performance
Gavetti, G., Helfat, C. E., & Luigi Marengo, B. (2017) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2017.0036 · Cited by 157
Cabigiosu, A., & Camuffo, A. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0655 · Cited by 163
Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2005) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127005050521 · Cited by 154
Self-citationWeigelt, C., & Sarkar, M. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.951 · Cited by 155
Bingham, C. B., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2007) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.1386 · Cited by 150
From product system to ecosystem: How firms adapt to provide an integrated value proposition
Stonig, J., Schmid, T., & Müller‐Stewens, G. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3390 · Cited by 150
Governing collaborative activity: interdependence and the impact of coordination and exploration
Aggarwal, V. A., Siggelkow, N., & Singh, H. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.900 · Cited by 149
Self-citationProactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model
Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.014 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- The Wharton School, 2017 Steinberg Hall—Dietrich Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
- ORCID
- Siggelkow, Nicolaj
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 290-311
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2129683067
- Cited by
- 900
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 44.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- organizational design, vertical hierarchy, incentive mechanisms, departmentalization, long-term performance, agent-based modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review