The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Media Planning Calculus
Abstract
A convenient on-line computer system selects and schedules advertising media. The system consists of a market-response model, a heuristic search routine, and a conversational input-output program. The user supplies a list of media options, a budget, and various objective and subjective data about the media options and the desired audience. The system selects a set of options and schedules them over time, seeking to maximize total market response. The model of market response works as follows: The population is divided into market segments. People in each segment are characterized by their sales potential and media habits. Ads placed in the media options lead people to be exposed to the advertising. The pattern of exposures in each market segment is determined by media coverage and duplication data. People tend to forget exposures and so the retained exposure level decays in the absence of new advertising. The response of an individual, in terms of the fraction of sales potential realized by the advertiser, increases with exposure level but with diminishing returns. Total market response is a sum over people, market segments, and time periods. The calculation of response is based on analytic formulas that are computationally very efficient. A maximum-seeking, heuristic calculation starts with any schedule, adds options with a high increment of response per dollar and deletes options with a low increment per dollar until no more improvement can be found for the given budget. An on-line system, called mediac, permits the use of model and heuristic at a remote console of a time-shared computer. Communication with the computer is conversational and largely self-explanatory. The system is operational. Computing costs have been a fraction of a per cent of the cost of the media scheduled. Improvements over previous schedules, as calculated by the model from the user's input data, have run from 5 per cent to over 20 per cent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Remembering and Forgetting of Advertising
Zielske, H. A. (1959) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224295902300301 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Marketing Analytics for Data-Rich Environments
Wedel, M., & Kannan, P. K. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0413 · Cited by 1,261
Decision Support Systems: A Historical Overview
Power, D. J. (2008) · International Handbooks on Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_7 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Little, J. D. C., & Lodish, L. M.
- Venue
- Operations Research
- Published
- 1969-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-35
- ISSN
- 0030-364X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5463
- OpenAlex
- W2034040524
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Media Planning Calculus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/opre.17.1.1
- The paper
- Little, J. D. C., & Lodish, L. M. (1969). A Media Planning Calculus. Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.17.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.