Cited by 208Marketing and Advertising StrategiesConsumer Market Behavior and PricingMemory Processes and Influences

The Remembering and Forgetting of Advertising

Zielske, Hubert A.·1959·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

How should advertising be scheduled? Should an advertising schedule be concentrated in an intensive “burst,” or should it be spread out over a longer period? For the same expenditure a relatively small number of consumers can be exposed to advertising many times, or a larger number can be exposed a smaller number of times. This unique study demonstrates how answers to these kinds of questions can be obtained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002224295902300301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zielske, H. A.
Affiliations
Manager of the Research Department and Supervisor of Advertising Research of Foote, Cone & Belding, Chicago
Corresponding author
Zielske, Hubert A.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
1959-01
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
239-243
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2319938887
Cited by
207
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
advertising scheduling, advertising frequency, advertising effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review