The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms
Abstract
This paper outlines an alternative theory of organization-environment coevolution that generalizes a model of organization adaptation first proposed by March (1991), linking firm-level exploration and exploitation adaptations to changes in the population of organizations. The theory considers organizations, their populations, and their environments as the interdependent outcome of managerial actions, institutional influences, and extra-institutional changes (technological, sociopolitical, and other environmental phenomena). In particular, the theory incorporates potential differences and equifinal outcomes related to country-specific variation. The basic theses of this paper are that firm strategic and organization adaptations coevolve with changes in the environment (competitive dynamics, technological, and institutional) and organization population and forms, and that new organizational forms can mutate and emerge from the existing population of organizations. The theory has guided a multicountry research collaboration on strategic and organization adaptations and the mutation and emergence of new organizational forms from within the existing population of organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Computation at the edge of chaos: Phase transitions and emergent computation
Langton, C. G. (1990) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90064-v · Cited by 1,527
Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change
van de Ven, A. H., & Huber, G. P. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.213 · Cited by 832
Co-Evolution of Capabilities and Industry: The Evolution of Mutual Fund Processing
Levinthal, D., & Myatt, J. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150905 · Cited by 343
Cited by
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 · Cited by 3,737
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576 · Cited by 3,705
An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377 · Cited by 3,286
International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective
Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275 · Cited by 3,118
The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22527456 · Cited by 2,880
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 535-550
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2137339664
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 40.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.10.5.535
- The paper
- Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N. (1999). The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
