The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia
Abstract
China and Russia represent major economies in transition from command economies, yet their paths to the market have differed greatly. Their divergent approaches have helped create distinct institutional environments. This study focuses on a particularly important strategic decision firms face—alliance partner selection. The study's results suggest that China's more stable and supportive institutional environment has helped Chinese firms take a longer-term view of alliance partner selection, focusing more on the potential partner's intangible assets along with technological and managerial capabilities. In contrast, the less stable Russian institutional environment has influenced Russian managers to focus more on the short term, selecting partners that provide access to financial capital and complementary capabilities so as to enhance their firms—ability to weather that nation's turbulent environment. This study contributes to knowledge about the influence of the institutional environment on alliance partner selection decisions for firms domiciled in transition (and emerging) economies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
STRATEGY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES.
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556394 · Cited by 3,835
MANAGERIAL TIES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE IN A TRANSITION ECONOMY: THE NATURE OF A MICRO-MACRO LINK.
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556406 · Cited by 2,861
The antecedents of deinstitutionalization
Oliver, C. (1992) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069201300403 · Cited by 1,746
Cited by
An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377 · Cited by 3,286
Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions
Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400167 · Cited by 845
Market and partner selection processes in international retail franchising
Doherty, A. M. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.011 · Cited by 145
Competitive Irrationality in Transitional Economies: Are Communist Managers Less Irrational?
Brouthers, L. E., Lascu, D.-N., & Werner, S. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9627-6 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-185
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2147281917
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 54.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.1030.0045
- The paper
- Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. (2004). The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.