The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the People's Republic of China
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, Western scholars have increasingly emphasized the importance of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB)—employees' behavior and actions that are not specifically designated in their formal job duties. Almost the entire body of empirical research on OCB is based on studies conducted in the United States, using U.S. employee populations as samples. Taking an inductive approach, we examined forms of OCB in the People's Republic of China (China). From a diverse sample of 158 employees and managers in 72 state-owned, collective, town and village, foreign-invested, and private enterprises in China, we collected 726 OCB incidents or items that were commonly observed in the workplace. We then subjected these to a content analysis to identify major forms of OCB. Results of our analysis revealed 10 dimensions of OCB, with at least one dimension not evident at all in the Western literature, and four that do not figure importantly in established OCB measures. The type of Organizations influenced the reporting of several forms of OCB. Results suggested that Chinese formulation of OCB differs from that in the West, and is embedded in its unique social and cultural context. We discuss these results in terms of their implications for future research in OCB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600307 · Cited by 5,897
The Role-Based Performance Scale: Validity Analysis of a Theory-Based Measure
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256941 · Cited by 809
Cited by
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013079 · Cited by 2,356
Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination
Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0176 · Cited by 1,647
Self-citationA Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research
Hong, W., Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0501 · Cited by 609
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.014 · Cited by 555
Babcock-Roberson, M. E., & Strickland, O. J. (2010) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223981003648336 · Cited by 486
Janssen, O., Lam, C. K., & Huang, X. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.614 · Cited by 230
Does the Job Satisfaction—Job Performance Relationship Vary Across Cultures?
Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Yim, F. H. K. (2009) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022109339208 · Cited by 123
Gong, B., Greenwood, R. A., Hoyte, D., Ramkissoon, A., & He, X. (2018) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-05-2016-0121 · Cited by 58
Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Role Breadth: A Meta‐Analytic and Cross‐Cultural Analysis
Jiao, C., Richards, D. A., & Hackett, R. D. (2013) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21555 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Farh, J.-L., Zhong, C.-B., & Organ, D. W.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-253
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2140031584
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.