Cited by 241Management and Organizational StudiesEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesInnovation and Knowledge Management

From Plan to Plant: Effects of Certification on Operational Start-up in the Emergent Independent Power Sector

Sine, Wesley D., David, Robert J., Mitsuhashi, Hitoshi·2007·Organization Science

Abstract

In this paper, we study the transition from planned venture to operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Planned ventures face tremendous obstacles in assembling the resources necessary to begin operations; we hypothesize and show that formal certification from authorized actors increases the likelihood of making this transition. Moreover, we find that the effects of certification are contingent on the legitimacy of the sector as a whole: Certifications have a stronger effect on start-ups when sector legitimacy is low than when it is high. This research helps us understand a rarely studied organizational transition—from entrepreneurial intention to actual operations—within nascent sectors. It directs attention to the legitimating effects of formal certification, highlights the importance of a multilevel approach to legitimacy, and contributes to the growing rapprochement between entrepreneurial studies and institutional theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1070.0300

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Authoritative endorsements signal quality and assure that an organization has substantively implemented required practices.

    “These authoritative endorsements serve as signals of quality and provide assurance that an organization has substantively implemented practices or engaged in activities that meet the requirements outlined by the certifying agency.”

    From Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic (2018) · cites this paper as Sine, David, and Mitsuhashi, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sine, W. D., David, R. J., & Mitsuhashi, H.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2007-08
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
578-594
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W1968578907
Cited by
241
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
certification, organizational change, entrepreneurial intention, institutional theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review