CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 158Corporate Identity and ReputationManagement and Organizational StudiesConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Certifications and Reputation: Determining the Standard of Desirability Amidst Uncertainty

Graffin, Scott D., Ward, Andrew J.·2010·Organization Science
DOI 10.1287/orsc.1080.0400
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We develop a theory that examines how a particular type of third-party quality signal, certifications, influences an actor's long-term reputation by addressing two different types of uncertainty. The first type deals with the degree to which the capabilities of an actor can be inferred over time based on known performance dimensions. We label this technical uncertainty. The second type deals with assessing whether the perceived capabilities of the actor meet the standard of desirability, which we call performance standard uncertainty. We propose and test that certifications will positively influence the long-term reputation of actors in situations that involve minimal technical uncertainty, and that, across levels of technical performance, certifications will have an inverted U-shaped relationship with assessments of actors such that certifications will have the greatest impact on assessments of actors who are close to the uncertain standard of desirability. We test our hypotheses in the context of the voting for Major League Baseball's Hall of Fame, an environment where comprehensive technical performance measures leave little technical uncertainty. Our results support our hypotheses and suggest that certifications can influence an actor's reputation by reducing performance standard uncertainty rather than just technical uncertainty, as previously presumed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1080.0400

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Cohen J., 2003, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavior Sciences
  2. Frick F. C., 1973, Games, Asterisks, & People: Memoirs of a Lucky Fan
  3. Lederer R., 2004, Baseball Analysts
  4. McConnell B., 2003, Baseball Res. J.
  5. Podolny J. M., 2005, Status Signals
  6. Thompson J. D., 1967, Organizations in Action
  7. Uzumeri M., 1997, Acad. Management Executive, 11, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 158

Related

Metadata

Authors
Graffin, S. D., & Ward, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Organization Science
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Published
2010-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
331-346
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
DOI
10.1287/orsc.1080.0400
OpenAlex
W2151148962
Cited by
158
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
certification, reputation, technological uncertainty, inverted U-shaped relationship, performance evaluation, organizational reputation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review