CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 582Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesInnovation and Knowledge ManagementManagement and Organizational Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive Processes of Opportunity Recognition: The Role of Structural Alignment

Grégoire, Denis A., Barr, Pamela S., Shepherd, Dean A.·2010·Organization Science
DOI 10.1287/orsc.1090.0462
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Substantial gains can be made by individuals and organizations adept at detecting new opportunities. But how do business leaders do that concretely? Organization research shows that managers are more inclined to identify threats than opportunities, but it is still not clear why this is the case. Likewise, research points to several factors that may facilitate the recognition of opportunities. Yet empirical observations have been limited by retrospective biases and other conceptual challenges. As a result, key questions remain not only about what factors facilitate the recognition of opportunities, but also about why these factors play such a role. To further understanding of these issues, we study the reasoning strategies that individuals mobilize for recognizing opportunities. We develop a model of opportunity recognition as a cognitive process of structural alignment, and analyze the think-aloud verbalizations of executive entrepreneurs as they try to recognize opportunities for new technologies. In contrast to prior research, the qualitative and quantitative data do not provide evidence that individuals use prototypes to recognize opportunities. Instead, we find that different kinds of mental connections play different roles in the process of recognizing opportunities, with different consequences. We also document why and how prior knowledge may facilitate this process. By drawing attention to the cognitive underpinnings of opportunity recognition, we cast light on why it constitutes such a challenging task for individuals and organizations. In turn, this provides a useful basis for exploring the factors that explain why some individuals/organizations are able to recognize opportunities that others simply fail to see.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1090.0462

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 107 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.2307/257995 · DOI
  2. Gavetti G., 2005, Harvard Bus. Rev., 83, 54
  3. 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hayek F. A. V., 1945, Amer. Econom. Rev., 35, 519
  5. Ireland R. D., 1999, Acad. Management Executive, 13, 43
  6. Ireland R. D., 2003, J. Management, 29, 963
  7. NASA, 2003, Spinoff 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 582

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Grégoire, D. A., Barr, P. S., & Shepherd, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
ORCID
Venue
Organization Science
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Published
2010-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
413-431
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
DOI
10.1287/orsc.1090.0462
OpenAlex
W2118430729
Cited by
582
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
26.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
opportunity recognition, structural alignment, cognitive processes, prior knowledge, prototype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review