Cited by 101Quality and Supply ManagementManagement Systems and Quality ImprovementJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The Effective Design of Work Under Total Quality Management

Victor, Bart, Boynton, Andrew, Stephens-Jahng, Theresa·2000·Organization Science

Abstract

In this research, we address the question: Why do many total quality management implementations fail? We develop a theoretical model in which the total quality management role for line employees results in a dual work design that requires both standardized production and continuous improvement. We propose that workers effectively integrate both types of work by switching, defined as shifting between standardized production and continuous work while on the job in response to situational cues. Alternatively, workers can respond to the challenges of a job involving both types of work by avoiding the continuous improvement work. Switching and avoidance are associated with different performance and attitudinal outcomes. We present evidence drawn from an exploratory field study which suggests that line employees who effectively integrate standardized production and continuous improvement work by switching experienced less job stress and greater job satisfaction. Moreover, plants which were more effective in total quality management performance had a greater proportion of line employees using switching.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.11.1.102.12566

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In work settings with detailed descriptions of expected sequences, participants introduce variations.

    “In work settings with detailed descriptions of the expected sequence of steps in a procedure, for instance, participants introduce variations (Roy, 1959; Victor, Boynton, and Stephens-Jahng, 2000; Narduzzo, Rocco, and Warglien, 2000).”

    From Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change (2003) · cites this paper as Victor, Boynton, and Stephens-Jahng, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Victor, B., Boynton, A., & Stephens-Jahng, T.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • International Institute for Management Development (CH)
  • Odenton, Maryland 21113
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2000-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
102-117
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W1991823282
Cited by
101
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
total quality management, job design, continuous improvement, production standardization, job switching, occupational stress, job satisfaction, situational cues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review