A Temporal Perspective on Organizational Identity
Abstract
We offer as our main theoretical contribution a conceptual framework for how the past is evoked in present identity reconstruction and the ways in which the past influences the articulation of claims for future identity. We introduce the notion of textual, material, and oral memory forms as the means by which organizational actors evoke the past. The conceptual framework is applied in a study of two occasions of identity reconstruction in the LEGO Group, which revealed differences in ways that the past was evoked and influenced claims for future identity. Our study suggests that (1) a longer time perspective in the use of memory enabled a longer time perspective in formulating claims for future identity, (2) a broader scope of articulated identity claims for the future was related to the combination of a broader range of memory forms, and (3) the depth of claims for future identity was related to the way in which memory forms were combined. At a more general level, our paper illustrates how viewing identity construction from the perspective of an ongoing present adds a new dimension to understanding the temporal dynamics of organizational identity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Re-narration is an essential dimension of legitimacy maintenance.
“This is not to suggest that organizations generally enact fictive Orwellian pasts; rather that re-narration is an essential dimension of legitimacy maintenance (Gioia, Schultz, & Corley, 2000;Schultz & Hernes, 2013).”
From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Schultz & Hernes, 2013
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789 · see citing works
Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258607 · Cited by 835 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025 · Cited by 2,580 · see citing works
Tsoukas, H. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12219 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0042 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.020 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schultz, M., & Hernes, T.
- Affiliations
- Copenhagen Business School (DK)
- Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School, 2000 Copenhagen F, Denmark; and Vestfold University College, N-3103 Tønsberg, Norway
- ORCID
- Schultz, Majken
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2103187935
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 43.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
- Keywords
- organizational identity, identity reconstruction, memory, time perspective, textual memory, material memory, oral memory, LEGO Group, identity claims, temporal dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review