Cited by 556Management and Organizational StudiesOrganizational Strategy and CultureCorporate Identity and Reputation

A Temporal Perspective on Organizational Identity

Schultz, Majken, Hernes, Tor·2013·Organization Science

Abstract

We offer as our main theoretical contribution a conceptual framework for how the past is evoked in present identity reconstruction and the ways in which the past influences the articulation of claims for future identity. We introduce the notion of textual, material, and oral memory forms as the means by which organizational actors evoke the past. The conceptual framework is applied in a study of two occasions of identity reconstruction in the LEGO Group, which revealed differences in ways that the past was evoked and influenced claims for future identity. Our study suggests that (1) a longer time perspective in the use of memory enabled a longer time perspective in formulating claims for future identity, (2) a broader scope of articulated identity claims for the future was related to the combination of a broader range of memory forms, and (3) the depth of claims for future identity was related to the way in which memory forms were combined. At a more general level, our paper illustrates how viewing identity construction from the perspective of an ongoing present adds a new dimension to understanding the temporal dynamics of organizational identity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1110.0731

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Re-narration is an essential dimension of legitimacy maintenance.

    “This is not to suggest that organizations generally enact fictive Orwellian pasts; rather that re-narration is an essential dimension of legitimacy maintenance (Gioia, Schultz, & Corley, 2000;Schultz & Hernes, 2013).”

    From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Schultz & Hernes, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schultz, M., & Hernes, T.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen Business School (DK)
  • Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School, 2000 Copenhagen F, Denmark; and Vestfold University College, N-3103 Tønsberg, Norway
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2013-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2103187935
Cited by
556
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
43.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Organization Science (publishedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
Keywords
organizational identity, identity reconstruction, memory, time perspective, textual memory, material memory, oral memory, LEGO Group, identity claims, temporal dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review