The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste
Open accessAbstract
Although many recent studies have emphasized the multiplicity of institutional logics and the competition among them, how some institutional logics become prioritized over others in shaping organizational decisions is undertheorized. Drawing on panel data of 118 industrial facilities across 34 communities in Texas and Louisiana, we show that the saliency of different kinds of community logics significantly affects environmental practices—specifically, toxic waste emissions—of facilities in a community. Our results show that community logics not only have direct effects but also have indirect effects by filtering organizational reactions to broader field-level institutional logics. We theorize how community logics can amplify or dampen the influence of broader field-level logics and discuss the implications for the study of institutional complexity, social movements, and values in the configuration of institutional logics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s
Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. R. (1997) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231170 · Cited by 1,237
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612449177 · Cited by 928 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, communities with a dominant politically conservative logic are generally more skeptical about claims of environmental problems with moral implications (Feinberg and Willer 2013).”
Background(2011) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2011.58.4.491 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2589 · Cited by 531
Self-citationDahlmann, F., & Grosvold, J. (2017) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.65 · Cited by 122
An Institutional Logics Perspective on the Gig Economy
Frenken, K., Vaskelainen, T., Fünfschilling, L., & Piscicelli, L. (2020) · Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizing · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000066005 · Cited by 118
Organizations’ Management Configurations Towards Environment and Market Performances
Ren, S., Fan, D., & Tang, G. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05299-4 · Cited by 25
A Tale of Two Types of Standard Setting: Evidence From Artificial Intelligence in China
Zhang, J., Li, X., & Tong, T. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221145130 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, M.-D. P., & Lounsbury, M.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 847-866
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W1978506782
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.2014.0959
- The paper
- Lee, M.-D. P., & Lounsbury, M. (2015). Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
