The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model
Abstract
The purpose of this article is twofold: first, to propose and test a model concerning how an organization's culture affects organizational performance; and second, to demonstrate the application of LISREL modeling methodology to estimate and test this model. Organizational culture is hypothesized to consist of three interrelated dimensions: a sociocultural system of the perceived functioning of the organization's strategies and practices, an organizational value system, and the collective beliefs of the individuals working within the organization. Organizational culture is operationalized by several latent variables: organizational structure and purpose, organizational values, task organization, climate, and individual values and beliefs. These variables, in turn, are hypothesized to affect organizational performance. Analysis of data from 392 respondents who participated in the study confirms the fit of the proposed model to the data. The model presented in the study represents an initial attempt to describe and evaluate the effects of various dimensions of organizational culture. It appears that the comparison of visible aspects of culture across and within organizations can provide useful information for guiding the directions of organizations. By investigating the variables defined in this study further, it may eventually be possible to explain why some organizations are not performing at desired levels of productivity. A methodological tool has also been presented in this article. It is clear that the application of structural equation modeling techniques can provide organizational scientists with powerful analytic tools for furthering theory testing and development. Structural modeling can be used to construct, estimate, and test a variety of models in organization science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Organizational Culture and Leadership
Tierney, W. G., & Schein, E. H. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258322 · Cited by 9,601
Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · Cited by 8,962
In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best- run companies
(1983) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(83)90015-8 · Cited by 4,437
Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis
Smircich, L. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392246 · Cited by 4,044
Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?
Barney, J. B. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258317 · Cited by 3,860
Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.391 · Cited by 3,824
Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393392 · Cited by 3,234
The Instructional Management Role of the Principal
Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x82018003004 · Cited by 899
Studying Organizational Cultures through Rites and Ceremonials
Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258488 · Cited by 897
Cited by
Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.820 · Cited by 2,252
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y · Cited by 2,137
“We included emergent paths in our model based on theoretical considerations (Marcoulides and Heck 1993) and MIs of 10.0 or more (Denison et al. 1996).”
MethodInfluentialReassessing the Principal's Role in School Effectiveness: A Review of Empirical Research, 1980-1995
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x96032001002 · Cited by 1,751
Self-citationDubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Blome, C., & Papadopoulos, T. (2019) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12355 · Cited by 881
Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants
Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583 · Cited by 685
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcoulides, G. A., & Heck, R. H.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-225
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2015868971
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.4.2.209
- The paper
- Marcoulides, G. A., & Heck, R. H. (1993). Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.2.209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.