The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research
Abstract
This article addresses theoretical and research frontiers for learning research, a second theme of Professor Argyris essay—the lead article in the “Crossroads” section. We outline three key theoretical questions for further work. We call for more systematic empirical learning research, suggesting that the paucity of such research may have resulted less from defensiveness than from the demanding requirements of doing crisp, systematic learning research. The need for scholarly empirical work is enhanced, we believe, by the growing popularity of organizational learning models among practitioners. Concurring with Professor Argyris' broad concern with enhancing research fruitfulness, we suggest ways to supplement traditional organizational research methods. In particular, we argue that it makes sense to cast wider nets for models of learning and adaptation, to sustain qualitative investigation, to use simulation techniques, and to maintain stronger—and perhaps even experimental—linkages between applied and theoretical research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection-Interrelated Processes of Change
Levinthal, D. A. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.140 · Cited by 401
Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections
Cohen, M. D. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.135 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Robey, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.167 · Cited by 765
Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507698293002 · Cited by 760
Umbrella Advocates Versus Validity Police: A Life-Cycle Model
Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.199 · Cited by 609
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact
Argote, L., & Greve, H. R. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0280 · Cited by 606
Remembrance of Things Past? The Dynamics of Organizational Forgetting
Holan, P. M. D., & Phillips, N. (2004) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0273 · Cited by 556
Metadata
- Authors
- Miner, A. S., & Mezias, S. J.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-99
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2097138969
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.7.1.88
- The paper
- Miner, A. S., & Mezias, S. J. (1996). Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.1.88
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.