The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Model of Risk in Declining Organizations: An Empirical Examination of Risk, Performance and Decline
Abstract
Scholars who study organizational decline have argued that declining organizations reduce or eliminate their riskier activities such as innovation. Further, they cite reduced risk-taking as a primary contributor to further decline. Scholars with an interest in risk per se come to the opposite conclusion: low performing firms often take more risks than other firms and such risks reduce subsequent performance. This study attempts to resolve these conflicting views by examining the risk of firms in decline. Our model, based on Cyert & March's (Cyert, R. M., J. G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.) behavioral theory of the firm, includes six basic variables: (1) performance, (2) slack, (3) aspirations, (4) expectations, (5) risk (income stream uncertainty), and (6) organization size as a measure of decline. The estimated model includes prior levels of risk and performance in the risk and performance equations respectively as controls. This study uses data on 344 low-performing firms in 19 manufacturing industries to estimate a time-series model that addresses both decline's influence on risk and risk's influence on performance while controlling for firm slack resources and industry factors. The results suggest (1) organizational decline and potential slack (debt/equity) positively influence risk whereas recoverable slack (SGA/Sales), and the difference between performance aspirations and expectations negatively influence risk; and (2) recoverable slack and risk negatively influence performance. We also examined the influences of performance and slack on organizational decline and found that performance associates negatively whereas recoverable and potential slack associate positively with decline. These results challenge the argument that declining firms reduce risk and so hurt their subsequent performance. Instead, the results suggest a cyclical process with positive feedback in which decline and the loss of certain slack resources increases risk which in turn reduces performance and results in further organizational shrinkage. Thus firms facing decline fall into a trap of taking unprofitable risks that ultimately exacerbates the decline. In addition, results relating slack to risk and performance exhibited inconsistent relations across the measures raising questions about the role slack resources play in risk and decline. Previous discussions of this slack implicitly assume all forms of slack have similar influences but our results demonstrate different forms of slack have very different effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity
White, H. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912934 · Cited by 25,861
Separation of Ownership and Control
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/467037 · Cited by 19,058
A Behavioral Theory of the FirmPreprint
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 6,482
Johnsen, E. (1964) · Ledelse & erhvervsøkonomi · Cited by 4,989
Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice
Child, J. (1972) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803857200600101 · Cited by 4,790
Kennedy, P. (1979) · Cited by 4,340
Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis
Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392337 · Cited by 3,629
Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking
March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404 · Cited by 3,183
Cited by
Horváth, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021 · Cited by 1,281
Slack Resources and the Performance of Privately Held Firms
George, G. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17843944 · Cited by 1,254
CEO Hubris and Firm Risk Taking in China: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion
Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48036912 · Cited by 1,082
Firm, strategic group, and industry influences on performance
Short, J. C., Ketchen, D. J., Palmer, T. B., & Hult, G. T. M. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.574 · Cited by 396
Shimizu, K. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.28226158 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiseman, R. M., & Bromiley, P.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 524-543
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W1981093901
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 20.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Model of Risk in Declining Organizations: An Empirical Examination of Risk, Performance and Decline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.7.5.524
- The paper
- Wiseman, R. M., & Bromiley, P. (1996). Toward a Model of Risk in Declining Organizations: An Empirical Examination of Risk, Performance and Decline. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.