The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed Mode Network Structures: The Strategic Use of Electronic Communication by Organizations
Abstract
The impact of interorganizational systems (IOSs) on the structure of market networks is analyzed from a management perspective. A research framework is applied to various organizational settings, yielding a range of mixed mode forms in which elements of both market and hierarchy are evident. These forms are more complex than the simple network or hybrid structures postulated in the management and information systems literature. The framework represents a departure from electronic markets theory, questioning its basic predictions that as companies trade electronically there will be proportionately more markets than hierarchies. Instead, IOSs make possible relationships that combine market and hierarchy elements simultaneously. Although economic forces are driving the changes in network structure, economic variables are tempered by individual firm strategies reflecting investment, network structure and IOS choices. The implications for theory are that traditional analyses of network structures and competition in business markets do not describe or explain adequately the structure and dynamics of competition in an electronic trading environment. The implications for managers are that they should consider the effects of mixed mode network structures on their processes for forming and managing business relationships supported by IOSs. The contribution of the paper is to provide a more accurate model of competition in business markets by demonstrating that multiple forms of mixed mode network structures exist. The mixed mode proposition is illustrated with case data from a range of mixed mode network structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
Jarillo, J. C. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090104 · Cited by 2,555
Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms
Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600201 · Cited by 1,337
Explaining the Swollen Middle: Why Most Transactions Are a Mix of “Market” and “Hierarchy”
Hennart, J.-F. (1993) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.4.4.529 · Cited by 652 · cited 1×
“Although the concept was previously identified in the literature, notably by Powell (1990), Hennart (1993), and Lynn and Rao (1995) the precise structure, operational details, and use of IOSs received only minor attention.”
Background
Cited by
Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism
Adler, P. S. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.215.10117 · Cited by 1,512
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El Sawy, O. A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148671 · Cited by 994
Metadata
- Authors
- Holland, C. P., & Lockett, A. G.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 475-488
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2069309830
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixed Mode Network Structures: The Strategic Use of Electronic Communication by Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.8.5.475
- The paper
- Holland, C. P., & Lockett, A. G. (1997). Mixed Mode Network Structures: The Strategic Use of Electronic Communication by Organizations. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.5.475
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.