Cited by 1,337Business Strategy and InnovationInnovation and Knowledge ManagementManagement and Organizational Studies

Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms

Grandori, Anna, Soda, Giuseppe·1995·Organization Studies

Abstract

This paper is an effort to review and organize the now vast literature on inter firm networks, with the aim of assessing the important current forms of net work, the organizational mechanisms supporting them, and the main variables that have been shown to influence network emergence and shape. These results are achieved through a literature review encompassing a number of approaches across the social sciences. The paper can therefore be used as a typological state-of-art on inter-firm networks, and as a basis for developing hypotheses of relationship between network antecedents and forms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/017084069501600201

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The principal benefits of networking identified in the literature include obtaining access to new markets and technologies.

    “obtaining access to new markets and technologies (Grandori and Soda, 1995);”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Grandori and Soda, 1995

  • A study of the UK/US defence industry has highlighted that dependency in relationships occur because of the breadth of links between partners, and such dependency and breadth often leads to the emergence of more complex networks.

    “A study of the UK/US defence industry, for example, has highlighted that dependency in relationships occur because of the breadth of links between partners, such dependency and breadth often leads to the emergence of more complex networks (Grandori and Soda, 1995;Coles, Harris and Dickson, 2003).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Grandori and Soda, 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grandori, A., & Soda, G.
Affiliations
Bocconi University (IT)
Venue
Organization Studies
Published
1995-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
183-214
ISSN
  • 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3044
OpenAlex
W2139455113
Cited by
1,337
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 80
FWCI
51.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
inter-firm networks, network emergence, network structure, organizational mechanisms, network typology, interorganizational relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review