Learning from Failure: Towards an Evolutionary Model of Collaborative Ventures
Abstract
This paper reports on a longitudinal case study of the interaction between two partners to a failed international joint venture. We develop a model of the collaboration process in partnership and alliances based on earlier work by Ring and Van de Ven (1994) and by Doz (1996). We employ a series of events that occurred in the course of the relationship as the unit of analysis in order to trace the interactions between the partners, and to explicate the impact that external shocks have on their perceptions of efficiency and equity. The impact of these events, as well as the responses they elicit, on the quality of the relationship (and vice versa) are also considered. We find that the partners' assessments cause them to either engage in renegotiation of the terms of the contract, or to modify their behavior unilaterally, in an attempt to restore balance to the relationship. The process feeds back until a new mutual understanding of equity is restored, or else the relationship deteriorates gradually until a point when the venture is dissolved. We conclude that positive feedback loops are critical in the evolutionary process, that relationship quality is both an outcome and a mediating variable, and that procedural issues are critical from the start in fostering a climate for positive reinforcement and the building of mutual trust and confidence in the relationship.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collaboration has been used to evoke distinctive elements of relational commitment or quality and fair behavior in alliances.
“our review reveals that collaboration has been used to evoke distinctive elements of relational commitment or quality (Ariño & De la Torre, 1998) and fair behavior in alliances (Ariño & Ring, 2010;Luo, 2008).”
From Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Ariño & De la Torre, 1998
Attitude, behavior, and outcome are analytically relevant to interorganizational relationships.
“The interplay between the literature on IORs (Ariño & De la Torre, 1998;Fombrun, 1986;Van de Ven et al., 1976) and our coding of these dimensions in the definitions showed that attitude, behavior, and outcome are analytically relevant to IORs.”
From Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Ariño & De la Torre, 1998
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455 · see citing works
A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures
Hennart, J. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090406 · Cited by 1,843 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The traditional economic view of alliances (Hennart 1988, Balakrishnan and Koza 1993, Buckley and Casson 1996) starts from a firm’s need to acquire necessary complementary resources in order to pursue a particular product/market strategy.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864 · see citing works
Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320901565 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Termination outcomes of research alliances
Reuer, J. J., & Zollo, M. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.11.003 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Involvement in knowledge-acquisition activities by venture team members and venture performance
Chandler, G. N., & Lyon, D. W. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00317.x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ariño, A., & de la Torre, J.
- Affiliations
- IESE Business School (ES)
- Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481
- ORCID
- Ariño, Africa
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 306-325
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2156036174
- Cited by
- 976
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 89.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- international joint ventures, interfirm collaboration, partnership dynamics, alliances, relationship quality, contract renegotiation, external shocks, positive feedback loop, trust and confidence, breakup
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review