The Concept and Dynamics of Face: Implications for Organizational Behavior in Asia
Abstract
Research on cross-cultural psychology, sociology, and anthropology suggests that the influence of face on social interactions is both pervasive and powerful in Asia. Face, however, has not gained general acceptance as an important theoretical concept in the literature on Asian organizational behavior and management. In this paper, we propose face as a key variable that can explain much of the complexity of social interactions in Asian organizations. We attempted to elaborate on the concept and dynamics of face in Asia in such a way as to capture its pervasive, significant but often subtle influences on organizational behavior. We also examined conditions, functions, and consequences of face dynamics to generate testable propositions for future research. We argue that scholars have to go beyond the individualistic assumptions about human behavior implicit in theories of organizational behavior in the West to better understand the richness of organizational behavior in Asia. In Asia, organizational behavior is better predicted by an individual's external attributes such as face than internal attributes such as desires, emotions, and cognition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Within an interdependent context, individuals may feel the need to protect one's own self-image or the image of the group they belong to, or in other words, to 'save face'.
“Within this interdependent context, individuals may feel the need to protect one's own selfimage or the image of the group they belong to (Yoon & Lau, 2008), or in other words, to 'save face' (Ho, 1976; Kim & Nam, 1998; Yu & Wen, 2003; Zhang et al., 2011).”
From Maladaptive Perfectionism, Disguised Distress, and Help Seeking in the Culture of 'Saving Face': Links to Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms among Asian Youth (2019) · cites this paper as Kim & Nam, 1998
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995 · see citing works
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019 · see citing works
Ho, D. Y.-F. (1976) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226145 · Cited by 1,168 · see citing works
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022002186017002006 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Shamed into anger? The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression.
Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P., Fletcher, C., & Gramzow, R. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.669 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Effects of embarrassment on behavior toward others.
Apsler, R. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076699 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, X.-A., Cao, Q., & Grigoriou, N. (2011) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224540903366669 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Tang, M., Li, F., Miesing, P., Mei, M., & Xu, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870655 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Wong, A. (2019) · PsyArXiv Preprints · doi:10.31234/osf.io/83gkw · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, J. Y., & Nam, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Chungbuk National University (KR)
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 522-534
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2138746005
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- face, cross-cultural management, social interaction in organizations, individualism-collectivism, organizational behavior theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review