The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The contributions of emissions and spatial microenvironments to exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion in Kenya.
Open accessAbstract
Acute and chronic respiratory diseases, which are causally linked to exposure to indoor air pollution in developing countries, are the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Efforts to develop effective intervention strategies and detailed quantification of the exposure-response relationship for indoor particulate matter require accurate estimates of exposure. We used continuous monitoring of indoor air pollution and individual time-activity budget data to construct detailed profiles of exposure for 345 individuals in 55 households in rural Kenya. Data for analysis were from two hundred ten 14-hour days of continuous real-time monitoring of concentrations of particulate matter [less than/equal to] 10 microm in aerodynamic diameter and the location and activities of household members. These data were supplemented by data on the spatial dispersion of pollution and from interviews. Young and adult women had not only the highest absolute exposure to particulate matter (2, 795 and 4,898 microg/m(3) average daily exposure concentrations, respectively) but also the largest exposure relative to that of males in the same age group (2.5 and 4.8 times, respectively). Exposure during brief high-intensity emission episodes accounts for 31-61% of the total exposure of household members who take part in cooking and 0-11% for those who do not. Simple models that neglect the spatial distribution of pollution within the home, intense emission episodes, and activity patterns underestimate exposure by 3-71% for different demographic subgroups, resulting in inaccurate and biased estimations. Health and intervention impact studies should therefore consider in detail the critical role of exposure patterns, including the short periods of intense emission, to avoid spurious assessments of risks and benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparative quantification of health risks conceptual framework and methodological issues
Murray, C. J., Ezzati, M., Lopez, A. D., Rodgers, A., & Vander Hoorn, S. (2003) · Population Health Metrics · doi:10.1186/1478-7954-1-1 · Cited by 887
Self-citationEzzati, M., & Kammen, D. M. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.021101057 · Cited by 503
Self-citationBiomass Fuels and Respiratory Diseases: A Review of the Evidence
Torres-Duque, C., Maldonado, D., Pérez-Padilla, R., Ezzati, M., & Viegi, G. (2008) · Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/pats.200707-100rp · Cited by 489
Self-citationRobust relationship between air quality and infant mortality in Africa
Heft-Neal, S., Burney, J., Bendavid, E., & Burke, M. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0263-3 · Cited by 363
PRODUCTIVE USES OF ENERGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Cabraal, R. A., Barnes, D. F., & Agarwal, S. G. (2005) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144228 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Ezzati, M., Saleh, H., & Kammen, D. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 833-839
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W1968759988
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The contributions of emissions and spatial microenvironments to exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion in Kenya. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.00108833
- The paper
- Ezzati, M., Saleh, H., & Kammen, D. M. (2000). The contributions of emissions and spatial microenvironments to exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion in Kenya. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.