The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental contaminants as etiologic factors for diabetes.
Open accessAbstract
For both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, the rates have been increasing in the United States and elsewhere; rates vary widely by country, and genetic factors account for less than half of new cases. These observations suggest environmental factors cause both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Occupational exposures have been associated with increased risk of diabetes. In addition, recent data suggest that toxic substances in the environment, other than infectious agents or exposures that stimulate an immune response, are associated with the occurrence of these diseases. We reviewed the epidemiologic data that addressed whether environmental contaminants might cause type 1 or type 2 diabetes. For type 1 diabetes, higher intake of nitrates, nitrites, and N-nitroso compounds, as well as higher serum levels of polychlorinated biphenyls have been associated with increased risk. Overall, however, the data were limited or inconsistent. With respect to type 2 diabetes, data on arsenic and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin relative to risk were suggestive of a direct association but were inconclusive. The occupational data suggested that more data on exposure to N-nitroso compounds, arsenic, dioxins, talc, and straight oil machining fluids in relation to diabetes would be useful. Although environmental factors other than contaminants may account for the majority of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, the etiologic role of several contaminants and occupational exposures deserves further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990-1998.
Mokdad, A. H., Ford, E. S., Bowman, B. A., Nelson, D. E., Engelgau, M. M., Vinicor, F., & Marks, J. S. (2000) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.23.9.1278 · Cited by 1,042
Cited by
Brook, R. D., Franklin, B., Cascio, W., Hong, Y., Howard, G., Lipsett, M., Luepker, R., Mittleman, M., Samet, J., Smith, S. C., et al. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000128587.30041.c8 · Cited by 2,380
Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health
Marshall, B. M., & Levy, S. B. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-11 · Cited by 2,241
Drinking Water Nitrate and Human Health: An Updated Review
Ward, M., Jones, R., Brender, J., De Kok, T., Weyer, P., Nolan, B., Villanueva, C., & Van Breda, S. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15071557 · Cited by 1,576
Knowns and unknowns on burden of disease due to chemicals: a systematic review
Prüss-Ustün, A., Vickers, C., Haefliger, P., & Bertollini, R. (2011) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-10-9 · Cited by 397
Rusiecki, J. A., Baccarelli, A., Bollati, V., Tarantini, L., Moore, L. E., & Bonefeld-Jorgensen, E. C. (2008) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.11338 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Longnecker, M. P., & Daniels, J. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- suppl 6
- Pages
- 871-876
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2082452703
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental contaminants as etiologic factors for diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.01109s6871
- The paper
- Longnecker, M. P., & Daniels, J. L. (2001). Environmental contaminants as etiologic factors for diabetes. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109s6871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.