The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemical contaminants in breast milk and their impacts on children's health: an overview.
Open accessAbstract
Human milk is the best source of nutrition for infants. Breast milk contains the optimal balance of fats, carbohydrates, and proteins for developing babies, and it provides a range of benefits for growth, immunity, and development. Unfortunately, breast milk is not pristine. Contamination of human milk is widespread and is the consequence of decades of inadequately controlled pollution of the environment by toxic chemicals. The finding of toxic chemicals in breast milk raises important issues for pediatric practice, for the practice of public health, and for the environmental health research community. It also illuminates gaps in current knowledge including a) insufficient information on the nature and levels of contaminants in breast milk; b) lack of consistent protocols for collecting and analyzing breast milk samples; c) lack of toxicokinetic data; and d) lack of data on health outcomes that may be produced in infants by exposure to chemicals in breast milk. These gaps in information impede risk assessment and make difficult the formulation of evidence-based health guidance. To address these issues, there is a need for a carefully planned and conducted national breast milk monitoring effort in the United States. Additionally, to assess health outcomes of toxic exposures via breast milk, it will be necessary to examine children prospectively over many years in longitudinal epidemiologic studies that use standardized examination protocols that specifically assess breast milk exposures. Finally, current risk assessment methods need to be expanded to include consideration of the potential risks posed to infants and children by exposures to chemical residues in breast milk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs): New Pollutants-Old Diseases
Siddiqi, M. A., Laessig, R. H., & Reed, K. D. (2003) · Clinical Medicine & Research · doi:10.3121/cmr.1.4.281 · Cited by 339
Milbrath, M. O., Wenger, Y., Chang, C.-W., Emond, C., Garabrant, D., Gillespie, B. W., & Jolliet, O. (2009) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.11781 · Cited by 279
van den Berg, M., Kypke, K., Kotz, A., Tritscher, A., Lee, S. Y., Magulova, K., Fiedler, H., & Malisch, R. (2017) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-016-1802-z · Cited by 256
Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) half-lives in humans: A systematic review
Idowu, I. G., Megson, D., Tiktak, G., Dereviankin, M., & Sandau, C. D. (2023) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140359 · Cited by 42
Developmental exposure to xenoestrogen enhances spatial learning in male rats
Corrieri, L., Della Seta, D., Canoine, V., & Fusani, L. (2007) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.002 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Landrigan, P. J., Sonawane, B., Mattison, D., McCally, M., & Garg, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- A313-A315
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2042983211
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical contaminants in breast milk and their impacts on children's health: an overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.021100313
- The paper
- Landrigan, P. J., Sonawane, B., Mattison, D., McCally, M., & Garg, A. (2002). Chemical contaminants in breast milk and their impacts on children's health: an overview. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.021100313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.