The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture.
Open accessAbstract
The industrial agriculture system consumes fossil fuel, water, and topsoil at unsustainable rates. It contributes to numerous forms of environmental degradation, including air and water pollution, soil depletion, diminishing biodiversity, and fish die-offs. Meat production contributes disproportionately to these problems, in part because feeding grain to livestock to produce meat--instead of feeding it directly to humans--involves a large energy loss, making animal agriculture more resource intensive than other forms of food production. The proliferation of factory-style animal agriculture creates environmental and public health concerns, including pollution from the high concentration of animal wastes and the extensive use of antibiotics, which may compromise their effectiveness in medical use. At the consumption end, animal fat is implicated in many of the chronic degenerative diseases that afflict industrial and newly industrializing societies, particularly cardiovascular disease and some cancers. In terms of human health, both affluent and poor countries could benefit from policies that more equitably distribute high-protein foods. The pesticides used heavily in industrial agriculture are associated with elevated cancer risks for workers and consumers and are coming under greater scrutiny for their links to endocrine disruption and reproductive dysfunction. In this article we outline the environmental and human health problems associated with current food production practices and discuss how these systems could be made more sustainable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sarmah, A. K., Meyer, M. T., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 · Cited by 3,326
Restoring Soil Quality to Mitigate Soil Degradation
Lal, R. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7055875 · Cited by 2,109
Unhealthy Landscapes: Policy Recommendations on Land Use Change and Infectious Disease Emergence
Patz, J. A., Daszak, P., Tabor, G. M., Aguirre, A. A., Pearl, M., Epstein, J., Wolfe, N. D., Kilpatrick, A. M., Foufopoulos, J., Molyneux, D., et al. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.6877 · Cited by 975
The Progressive Increase of Food Waste in America and Its Environmental Impact
Hall, K. D., Guo, J., Dore, M., & Chow, C. C. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007940 · Cited by 748
“Furthermore, given that the average farm requires 3 kcal of fossil fuel energy to produce 1 kcal of food (before accounting for energy requirements of food processing and transportation) [14], wasted food accounts for ,300 million barrels of oil per year representing ,4% of the total US oil consumption in 2003 [15].”
BackgroundKremen, C., Iles, A., & Bacon, C. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05103-170444 · Cited by 732
Eshel, G., Shepon, A., Makov, T., & Milo, R. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1402183111 · Cited by 466
Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111211 · Cited by 408
Functional Soil Microbiome: Belowground Solutions to an Aboveground Problem
Lakshmanan, V., Selvaraj, G., & Bais, H. P. (2014) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.245811 · Cited by 400
Barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture practices: change agent perspectives
Rodriguez, J. M., Molnar, J. J., Fazio, R. A., Sydnor, E., & Lowe, M. J. (2009) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170508002421 · Cited by 310
Cáceres, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/joac.12057 · Cited by 284
Should the biofilm mode of life be taken into consideration for microbial biocontrol agents?
Pandin, C., Le Coq, D., Canette, A., Aymerich, S., & Briandet, R. (2017) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.12693 · Cited by 157
Orchard management , soil organic carbon and ecosystem services in Mediterranean fruit tree crops
Montanaro, G., Xiloyannis, C., Nuzzo, V., & Dichio, B. (2017) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.01.012 · Cited by 154
A landscape perspective on sustainability of agricultural systems
Dale, V. H., Kline, K. L., Kaffka, S. R., & Langeveld, J. W. A. (2013) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9814-4 · Cited by 83
Phytoremediation as a viable ecological and socioeconomic management strategy
Phang, L.-Y., Mingyuan, L., Mohammadi, M., Tee, C.-S., Yuswan, M. H., Cheng, W.-H., & Lai, K.-S. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-34585-z · Cited by 53
Ag-YOLO: A Real-Time Low-Cost Detector for Precise Spraying With Case Study of Palms
Qin, Z., Wang, W., Dammer, K.-H., Guo, L., & Cao, Z. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.753603 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R. S., & Walker, P.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 445-456
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2168227788
- Cited by
- 1,192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
