Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 848

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cancer Risk Assessment, Indicators, and Guidelines for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Ambient Air

Open access
Boström, Carl-Elis, Gerde, Per, Hanberg, Annika, Jernström, Bengt, Johansson, Christer, Kyrklund, Titus, Rannug, Agneta, Törnqvist, Margareta, Victorin, Katarina, Westerholm, Roger·2002·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

The Swedish Governmental Commission on Environment and Health (SOU 1996) and the Governmental Committee on Environmental Objectives (SOU 2000) proposed, among other things, targets for carcinogenic air pollutants in order to fulfill the national objectives for the reduction of harmful emissions

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.02110s3451

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 848

Metadata

Authors
Boström, C.-E., Gerde, P., Hanberg, A., Jernström, B., Johansson, C., Kyrklund, T., Rannug, A., Törnqvist, M., Victorin, K., & Westerholm, R.
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2002-02-15
Volume
110
Issue
s3
Pages
451-489
ISSN
0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4239384318
Cited by
848
References
0
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Risk Assessment, Indicators, and Guidelines for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Ambient Air. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.02110s3451
The paper
Boström, C.-E., Gerde, P., Hanberg, A., Jernström, B., Johansson, C., Kyrklund, T., Rannug, A., Törnqvist, M., Victorin, K., & Westerholm, R. (2002). Cancer Risk Assessment, Indicators, and Guidelines for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Ambient Air. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.02110s3451

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.