The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating Regional Spatial and Temporal Variability of PM 2.5 Concentrations Using Satellite Data, Meteorology, and Land Use Information
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Background Studies of chronic health effects due to exposures to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5) are often limited by sparse measurements. Satellite aerosol remote sensing data may be used to extend PM2.5 ground networks to cover a much larger area. Objectives In this study we examined the benefits of using aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrieved by the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) in conjunction with land use and meteorologic information to estimate ground-level PM2.5 concentrations. Methods We developed a two-stage generalized additive model (GAM) for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency PM2.5 concentrations in a domain centered in Massachusetts. The AOD model represents conditions when AOD retrieval is successful; the non-AOD model represents conditions when AOD is missing in the domain. Results The AOD model has a higher predicting power judged by adjusted R2 (0.79) than does the non-AOD model (0.48). The predicted PM2.5 concentrations by the AOD model are, on average, 0.8–0.9 μg/m3 higher than the non-AOD model predictions, with a more smooth spatial distribution, higher concentrations in rural areas, and the highest concentrations in areas other than major urban centers. Although AOD is a highly significant predictor of PM2.5, meteorologic parameters are major contributors to the better performance of the AOD model. Conclusions GOES aerosol/smoke product (GASP) AOD is able to summarize a set of weather and land use conditions that stratify PM2.5 concentrations into two different spatial patterns. Even if land use regression models do not include AOD as a predictor variable, two separate models should be fitted to account for different PM2.5 spatial patterns related to AOD availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities
Dockery, D. W., Pope, C. A., Xu, X., Spengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Fay, M. E., Ferris, B. G., & Speizer, F. E. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312093292401 · Cited by 8,018
Wood, S. N. (2006) · doi:10.1201/9781420010404 · Cited by 4,953
Long-term exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women
Miller, K. A., Siscovick, D. S., Sheppard, L., Shepherd, K., Sullivan, J. H., Anderson, G. L., & Kaufman, J. D. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa054409 · Cited by 1,854
Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles
Jerrett, M., Burnett, R. T., Ma, R., Pope, C. A., Krewski, D., Newbold, K. B., Thurston, G., Shi, Y., Finkelstein, N., Calle, E. E., et al. (2005) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000181630.15826.7d · Cited by 985
Cited by
Di, Q., Amini, H., Shi, L., Kloog, I., Silvern, R., Kelly, J., Sabath, M. B., Choirat, C., Koutrakis, P., Lyapustin, A., et al. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.104909 · Cited by 733
Self-citationEstimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach
Hu, X., Belle, J. H., Meng, X., Wildani, A., Waller, L. A., Strickland, M. J., & Liu, Y. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01210 · Cited by 629
Self-citationAssessing PM 2.5 Exposures with High Spatiotemporal Resolution across the Continental United States
Di, Q., Kloog, I., Koutrakis, P., Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., & Schwartz, J. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b06121 · Cited by 510
Self-citationLi, T., Shen, H., Yuan, Q., Zhang, X., & Zhang, L. (2017) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl075710 · Cited by 414
A novel calibration approach of MODIS AOD data to predict PM 2.5 concentrations
Lee, H. J., Liu, Y., Coull, B. A., Schwartz, J., & Koutrakis, P. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-7991-2011 · Cited by 408
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Paciorek, C. J., & Koutrakis, P.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 886-892
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2031528200
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Regional Spatial and Temporal Variability of PM 2.5 Concentrations Using Satellite Data, Meteorology, and Land Use Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.0800123
- The paper
- Liu, Y., Paciorek, C. J., & Koutrakis, P. (2009). Estimating Regional Spatial and Temporal Variability of PM 2.5 Concentrations Using Satellite Data, Meteorology, and Land Use Information. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.