The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation: A Review of the Benefits and Potential Risks
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Although industrial sectors involving semiconductors; memory and storage technologies; display, optical, and photonic technologies; energy; biotechnology; and health care produce the most products that contain nanomaterials, nanotechnology is also used as an environmental technology to protect the environment through pollution prevention, treatment, and cleanup. In this review, we focus on environmental cleanup and provide a background and overview of current practice; research findings; societal issues; potential environment, health, and safety implications; and future directions for nanoremediation. We do not present an exhaustive review of chemistry/engineering methods of the technology but rather an introduction and summary of the applications of nanotechnology in remediation. We also discuss nanoscale zerovalent iron in detail. DATA SOURCES: We searched the Web of Science for research studies and accessed recent publicly available reports from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other agencies and organizations that addressed the applications and implications associated with nanoremediation techniques. We also conducted personal interviews with practitioners about specific site remediations. DATA SYNTHESIS: We aggregated information from 45 sites, a representative portion of the total projects under way, to show nanomaterials used, types of pollutants addressed, and organizations responsible for each site. CONCLUSIONS: Nanoremediation has the potential not only to reduce the overall costs of cleaning up large-scale contaminated sites but also to reduce cleanup time, eliminate the need for treatment and disposal of contaminated soil, and reduce some contaminant concentrations to near zero-all in situ. Proper evaluation of nanoremediation, particularly full-scale ecosystem-wide studies, needs to be conducted to prevent any potential adverse environmental impacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metals, Toxicity and Oxidative Stress
Valko, M., Morris, H., & Cronin, M. (2005) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867053764635 · Cited by 5,018
Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview
Zhang, W.-X. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025520116015 · Cited by 2,003
Cited by
Qu, X., Brame, J., Li, Q., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300029v · Cited by 799
Environmental transformations and ecological effects of iron-based nanoparticles
Lei, C., Sun, Y., Tsang, D. C. W., & Lin, D. (2018) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.052 · Cited by 347
Rajapaksha, A. U., Ahmad, M., Vithanage, M., Kim, K.-R., Chang, J. Y., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2015) · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · doi:10.1007/s10653-015-9694-z · Cited by 128
Truskewycz, A., Shukla, R., & Ball, A. S. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2016.10.008 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Karn, B., Kuiken, T., & Otto, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1813-1831
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2148558214
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation: A Review of the Benefits and Potential Risks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.0900793
- The paper
- Karn, B., Kuiken, T., & Otto, M. (2009). Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation: A Review of the Benefits and Potential Risks. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900793
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.