CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 107Air Quality and Health ImpactsEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Ambient Air Pollution during Early Pregnancy on Fetal Ultrasonic Measurements during Mid-Pregnancy

Open access
Hansen, Craig A., Barnett, Adrian G., Pritchard, Gary·2008·Environmental Health Perspectives
DOI 10.1289/ehp.10720PMC PMC2265059
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Over the past decade there has been mounting evidence that ambient air pollution during pregnancy influences fetal growth. Objectives: This study was designed to examine possible associations between fetal ultrasonic measurements collected from 15,623 scans (13–26 weeks gestation) and ambient air pollution during early pregnancy. Methods: We calculated mothers’ average monthly exposures over the first 4 months of pregnancy for the following pollutants: particulate matter < 10 μm aerodynamic diameter (PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. We examined associations with fetal femur length (FL), biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), and abdominal circumference (AC). Final analyses included scans from only those women within 2 km of an air pollution monitoring site. We controlled for long-term trend, season, temperature, gestation, mother’s age, socioeconomic status, and fetal sex. Results: A reduction in fetal AC was associated with O3 during days 31–60 [−1.42 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.74 to −0.09], SO2 during days 61–90 (−1.67 mm; 95% CI, −2.94 to −0.40), and PM10 during days 91–120 (−0.78 mm; 95% CI, −1.49 to −0.08). Other results showed a reduction in BPD (−0.68 mm; 95% CI, −1.09 to −0.27) associated with SO2 during days 0–30, a reduction in HC (−1.02 mm; 95% CI, −1.78 to −0.26) associated with PM10 during days 91–120, and a reduction in FL associated with PM10 during days 0–30 (−0.28 mm; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.08) and 91–120 (−0.23; 95% CI, −0.42 to −0.04). Conclusion: We found strong effects of ambient air pollution on ultrasound measures. Future research, including more individually detailed data, is needed to confirm our results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.10720

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Change in ultrasound measurements (mm) for a 5-μg/m3 increase in PM10 during days 0–30 of gestation by distance to monitor. (A) AC; (B) BPD; (C) FL; (D) HC.
Figure 1 Change in ultrasound measurements (mm) for a 5-μg/m3 increase in PM10 during days 0–30 of gestation by distance to monitor. (A) AC; (B) BPD; (C) FL; (D) HC.CC0 · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Change in ultrasound measurements (mm) for an 0.8-ppb increase in SO2 during days 0–30 of gestation by distance to monitor. (A) AC; (B) BPD; (C) FL; (D) HC.
Figure 2 Change in ultrasound measurements (mm) for an 0.8-ppb increase in SO2 during days 0–30 of gestation by distance to monitor. (A) AC; (B) BPD; (C) FL; (D) HC.CC0 · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Change in (mm) in ultrasound measurements for an 8-ppb increase in O3 during days 31–60 of gestation by distance to monitor. (A) AC; (B) BPD; (C) FL; (D) HC.
Figure 3 Change in (mm) in ultrasound measurements for an 8-ppb increase in O3 during days 31–60 of gestation by distance to monitor. (A) AC; (B) BPD; (C) FL; (D) HC.CC0 · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2001, Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Area’s (SEIFA), Australia
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2001, Australian Standard Geographical Classification Digital Boundaries, Australia, 2001 (CD-ROM)
  3. Ville, 2003, Growth, Doppler and Fetal Assessment. In: Diagnostic Imaging of Fetal Anomalies

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hansen, C. A., Barnett, A. G., & Pritchard, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • PacUser, Paddington, Queensland, Australia
Corresponding author
Hansen, Craig A.
ORCID
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2007-12-17
Volume
116
Issue
3
Pages
362-369
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
DOI
10.1289/ehp.10720
PMC
PMC2265059
OpenAlex
W2011731379
Cited by
107
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
ambient air pollution, early pregnancy, fetal growth, PM10, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, abdominal circumference, biparietal diameter, head circumference, femur length, prenatal exposure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Maternal Exposure, Fetal Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review