Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrafine particles in the urban air: to the respiratory tract--and beyond?

Open access
Oberdörster, Günter, Utell, Mark J·2002·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

In 1994, when we introduced the ultrafine particle hypothesis stating that ambient ultrafine particles (UFP; < 0.1 µm in aerodynamic diameter) may cause adverse health effects at the first Colloquium for Particulate Air Pollution and Human Mortality and Morbidity in Irvine, California, it was met with friendly skepticism as well as out-right dismissal.Arguments were that UFP are very short-lived and disappear through heterogeneous and homogeneous aggregation within seconds or minutes and therefore are toxicologically irrelevant.These arguments did not recognize that UFP are continuously generated or that ambient UFP contribute very little, if any, mass to ambient PM 10 (particles < 10 µm in aerodynamic diameter) or PM 2.5 (particles < 2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter).Indeed, the mass distribution of a typical urban aerosol among the different particle sizes may support this point (Figure 1).This attitude of skepticism has changed considerably.Research teams across the world are working now on UFP, forming multidisciplinary alliances between atmospheric scientists, engineers, epidemiologists, clinicians, and toxicologists.They investigate UFP sources, generation, physicochemical characteristics, behavior in ambient air, and potential effects and underlying mechanisms following their inhalation.Still, sound skepticism lingers, as demonstrated by the title of a presentation at the 2002 meeting of the Health Effects Institute: "Nanoparticles: Are They Real?"Obviously, there is no question that UFP are real, but it is also clear that we still do not know enough about them, despite significant progress in our understanding since 1994.Atmospheric UFP derived from gas-to-particle conversions have many sources, natural and anthropogenic, the latter being mostly derived from internal combustion Günter Oberdörster is an inhalation toxicologist who has been investigating effects and toxicokinetics of occupational and environmental particles for more than 25 years, more recently focusing on ultrafine particles.He is Professor of Toxicology and Director of the the U.S. EPA-funded Particulate Matter Center on ultrafine particles

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.110-1240959

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Oberdörster, G., & Utell, M. J.
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2002-08
Volume
110
Issue
8
Pages
A440-A441
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2087086324
Cited by
286
References
1
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrafine particles in the urban air: to the respiratory tract--and beyond? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.110-1240959
The paper
Oberdörster, G., & Utell, M. J. (2002). Ultrafine particles in the urban air: to the respiratory tract--and beyond? Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.110-1240959

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.