Cited by 243Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementExtraction and Separation Processes

Unfair Trade e-Waste in Africa

Open access
Schmidt, Charles W.·2006·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

Africa is quickly becoming a destination for information technology in the form of tons of used computers, fax machines, cell phones, and other electronics. Although many of these machines can be repaired and resold, up to 75% of the electronics shipped to Africa is junk. This equipment, when dumped, may leach lead, mercury, and cadmium into the environment; when burned, it may release carcinogenic dioxins and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. In the United States, activists are working to limit the flow of e-waste to developing countries through international agreements and voluntary e-waste export reduction efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.114-a232

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unfair practice of importing waste, especially e-waste, from developed nations, is to a large part responsible for this problem in Africa.

    “The unfair practice of importing waste, especially e-waste, from developed nations, is to a large part responsible for this problem in Africa for example (Schmidt, 2006).”

    From Future Scenarios of Global Plastic Waste Generation and Disposal (2019) · cites this paper as Schmidt, 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, C. W.
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Charles W.
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
114
Issue
4
Pages
A232-A235
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2045240155
Cited by
243
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
electronic waste, e-waste export, unfair trade, developing countries, lead, mercury, cadmium, dioxins, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, hazardous waste dumping, international environmental agreements
MeSH terms
Africa, Computers, Conservation of Natural Resources, Electronics, Environmental Pollutants, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review