Cited by 258Pesticide Exposure and ToxicityPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Measurement of pesticides and other toxicants in amniotic fluid as a potential biomarker of prenatal exposure: a validation study

Open access
Bradman, Asa, Barr, Dana B, Claus Henn, Birgit G, Drumheller, Timothy, Curry, Cynthia, Eskenazi, Brenda·2003·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

Prenatal pesticide exposures may adversely affect children's health. However, exposure and health research is hampered by the lack of reliable fetal exposure data. No studies have been published that report measurements of commonly used nonpersistent pesticides in human amniotic fluid, although recent studies of pesticides in urine from pregnant women and in meconium indicate that fetuses are exposed to these chemicals. Amniotic fluid collected during amniocentesis is the only medium available to characterize direct fetal exposures early in pregnancy (approximately 18 weeks of gestation). As a first step in validating this exposure biomarker, we collected 100 amniotic fluid samples slated for disposal and evaluated analytical methods to measure organophosphate and carbamate pesticides and metabolites, synthetic pyrethroid metabolites, herbicides, and chlorinated phenolic compounds. The following six phenols were detected (detection frequency): 1- and 2-naphthol (70%), 2,5-dichlorophenol (55%), carbofuranphenol (5%), ortho-phenylphenol (30%), and pentachlorophenol (15%), with geometric mean concentrations of 0.72, 0.39, 0.12, 0.13, and 0.23 microg/L, respectively, for positive values. The organophosphate metabolites diethylphosphate and dimethylphosphate were detected in two (10%) samples, and dimethylthiophosphate was detected in one (5%) sample, with geometric mean concentrations of 0.31, 0.32, and 0.43 microg/L, respectively, for positive values. These levels are low compared with levels reported in urine, blood, and meconium in other studies, but indicate direct exposures to the young fetus, possibly during critical periods of development. Results of this pilot study suggest that amniotic fluid offers a unique opportunity to investigate fetal exposures and health risks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.6259

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradman, A., Barr, D. B., Claus Henn, B. G., Drumheller, T., Curry, C., & Eskenazi, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Center for Children's Environmental Health Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-7380, USA. abradman@socrates.berkeley.edu
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
111
Issue
14
Pages
1779-1782
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2025518612
Cited by
258
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • University of California Berkeley
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES01896, P30ES001896, P30-ES01896, P01ES009605, 5P01 ES09605-04)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
amniotic fluid, prenatal pesticide exposure, organophosphorus pesticides, carbamate pesticides, herbicides, chlorophenols, phenols, diethyl phosphate, dimethyl phosphate, dimethylthiophosphate, naphthols, pentachlorophenol, ortho-phenylphenol, 2,5-dichlorophenol, amniocentesis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amniotic Fluid, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Pesticides, Phenols, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review