The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticles: Health Effects—Pros and Cons
Open accessAbstract
With the advent of nanotechnology, the prospects for using engineered nanomaterials with diameters of < 100 nm in industrial applications, medical imaging, disease diagnoses, drug delivery, cancer treatment, gene therapy, and other areas have progressed rapidly. The potential for nanoparticles (NPs) in these areas is infinite, with novel new applications constantly being explored. The possible toxic health effects of these NPs associated with human exposure are unknown. Many fine particles generally considered "nuisance dusts" are likely to acquire unique surface properties when engineered to nanosize and may exhibit toxic biological effects. Consequently, the nuisance dust may be transported to distant sites and could induce adverse health effects. In addition the beneficial uses of NPs in drug delivery, cancer treatment, and gene therapy may cause unintentional human exposure. Because of our lack of knowledge about the health effects associated with NP exposure, we have an ethical duty to take precautionary measures regarding their use. In this review we highlight the possible toxic human health effects that can result from exposure to ultrafine particles (UFPs) generated by anthropogenic activities and their cardiopulmonary outcomes. The comparability of engineered NPs to UFPs suggests that the human health effects are likely to be similar. Therefore, it is prudent to elucidate their toxicologic effect to minimize occupational and environmental exposure. Highlighting the human health outcomes caused by UFPs is not intended to give a lesser importance to either the unprecedented technologic and industrial rewards of the nanotechnology or their beneficial human uses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel
Nel, A., Xia, T., Mädler, L., & Li, N. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114397 · Cited by 9,324
Semiconductor Nanocrystals as Fluorescent Biological Labels
Bruchez, M., Moronne, M., Gin, P., Weiss, S., & Alivisatos, A. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5385.2013 · Cited by 8,613
An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities
Dockery, D. W., Pope, C. A., Xu, X., Spengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Fay, M. E., Ferris, B. G., & Speizer, F. E. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312093292401 · Cited by 8,018
Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles
Oberdörster, G., Oberdörster, E., & Oberdörster, J. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7339 · Cited by 7,891
In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots
Gao, X., Cui, Y., Levenson, R. M., Chung, L. W. K., & Nie, S. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt994 · Cited by 4,772
Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream
Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095833 · Cited by 4,552
Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of U.S. adults.
Pope, C. A., Thun, M. J., Namboodiri, M. M., Dockery, D. W., Evans, J. S., Speizer, F. E., & Heath, C. W. (1995) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.151.3.7881654 · Cited by 2,911
Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Hospital Admission for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases
Dominici, F., Peng, R. D., Bell, M. L., Pham, L., McDermott, A., Zeger, S. L., & Samet, J. M. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.10.1127 · Cited by 2,634
Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain
Oberdörster, G., Sharp, Z., Atudorei, V., Elder, A., Gelein, R., Kreyling, W., & Cox, C. (2004) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370490439597 · Cited by 2,606
Pope, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thurston, G. D., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., & Godleski, J. J. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000108927.80044.7f · Cited by 2,592
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies
Pang, Z., Raudonis, R., Glick, B. R., Lin, T.-J., & Cheng, Z. (2019) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013 · Cited by 2,306
Nanoparticles in cellular drug delivery
Faraji, A. H., & Wipf, P. (2009) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2009.02.043 · Cited by 903
Fadeel, B., & Garcia-Bennett, A. E. (2010) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.008 · Cited by 783
Toxicity Assessments of Multisized Gold and Silver Nanoparticles in Zebrafish Embryos
Bar‐Ilan, O., Albrecht, R. M., Fako, V. E., & Furgeson, D. Y. (2009) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.200801716 · Cited by 648
Santhoshkumar, T., Rahuman, A. A., Jayaseelan, C., Rajakumar, G., Marimuthu, S., Kirthi, A. V., Velayutham, K., Thomas, J., Venkatesan, J., & Kim, S.-K. (2014) · Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine · doi:10.1016/s1995-7645(14)60171-1 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Gwinn, M. R., & Vallyathan, V.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1818-1825
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2107205997
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 25.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoparticles: Health Effects—Pros and Cons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.8871
- The paper
- Gwinn, M. R., & Vallyathan, V. (2006). Nanoparticles: Health Effects—Pros and Cons. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
