The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Model for Nurse Practitioner Regulation: Principles Underpinning a Three-Registration Category Approach
Abstract
The issue of professional regulation of advanced nursing practice is one of the most controversial in the area of nursing regulation today. The controversy affects the roles and scope of advanced practice as well as education requirements. Nurse practitioner (NP) practice is one kind of advanced nursing practice receiving attention currently, with a view to developing consistent educational and regulatory approaches. Consistency is needed to enhance the mobility and flexibility of these important healthcare provider resources in time of shortages. This paper describes how the regulatory body in British Columbia decided to register only three categories of NP: family/all ages, adult and pediatrics. It describes the state of NP regulation when the work began, the consultation process used in coming to this decision and the principles underlying the decision. Regulators, educators and administrators may benefit from understanding the issues and reasoning presented. Literature to guide this work was lacking, a gap this paper addresses to help inform decision-making in other settings and contexts. Dialogue about this approach may facilitate movement towards consistent approaches to the regulation, education and deployment of NPs in Canada and elsewhere.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Publications led by, commissioned by, or involving regulators typically focus specifically on regulatory standards, processes, and reforms.
“In contrast, publications led by, commissioned by, or involving regulators typically focus specifically on regulatory standards, processes, and reforms [34,37,49,51,56,61,64,65,75,76,87–90,142,157,163,164,168,174,176,177], reflecting the topics that nursing regulators likely find more relevant in guiding their work.”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Advanced practice nursing regulation has been driven by advocacy efforts led by non-regulator researchers aiming to reduce barriers to practice.
“while advanced practice nursing regulation has been driven by advocacy efforts led by non-regulator researchers aiming to reduce barriers to practice [31–35,63,92,104,106,146–150,162,169–171,179,202–204].”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Role in Canada
Kilpatrick, K., Harbman, P., Carter, N., Martin‐Misener, R., Bryant‐Lukosius, D., Donald, F., Kaasalainen, S., Bourgeault, I. L., & DiCenso, A. (2010) · Nursing leadership · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2010.22272 · Cited by 40
A structural equation model of empowerment factors affecting nurse practitioners competence
Duff, E. (2019) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2019.06.002 · Cited by 30
Understanding acute care nurse practitioner communication and decision‐making in healthcare teams
Kilpatrick, K. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04119.x · Cited by 28
“Greater harmonisation of licensing board policies and consistency across jurisdictions have important implications for the movement of providers across jurisdictions (Wearing et al. 2010).”
BackgroundNursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review
Chiu, P., Thiessen, N. J., Idrees, S., Leslie, K., & Kung, J. Y. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323716 · Cited by 12
Establishing a Regulatory Framework for Certified Practices in British Columbia
Wearing, J., & Nickerson, V. (2010) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(15)30333-1 · Cited by 8
Self-citationFoster, S. (2012) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(15)30250-7 · Cited by 2
Developing the Clinical Licensure Examination for Nurse Practitioners in British Columbia
Napolitano, M., Roots, A., Hoyle, C., et al. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(15)30268-4 · Cited by 2
Duff, E. (2016) · Scholarship@Western (Western University)
How Advanced Practice Holistic Nurses Meet International Criteria for Advanced Practice
Southard, M. E. (2023) · Holistic Nursing Practice · doi:10.1097/hnp.0000000000000577
Metadata
- Authors
- Wearing, J., Black, J., & Kline, K.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Nursing leadership
- Publisher
- Longwoods Publishing
- Published
- 2010-03-18
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 40-49
- ISSN
- 1481-9643 (ISSN-L)
- 1929-6355
- OpenAlex
- W2170965460
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing leadership (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Law › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
- Keywords
- nurse practitioner regulation, advanced practice nursing, professional registration, family nurse practitioners, pediatric nurse practitioners, scope of practice, nursing education requirements, regulatory decision-making, British Columbia, labor mobility, health workforce shortage
- MeSH terms
- British Columbia, Canada, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Patient Care, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Safety, Specialty Boards, Models, Nursing, Government Regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review