Cited by 9Nursing Roles and PracticesNursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipOccupational and Professional Licensing Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Model for Nurse Practitioner Regulation: Principles Underpinning a Three-Registration Category Approach

Wearing, Jo, Black, Joyce, Kline, Karen·2010·Nursing leadership

Abstract

The issue of professional regulation of advanced nursing practice is one of the most controversial in the area of nursing regulation today. The controversy affects the roles and scope of advanced practice as well as education requirements. Nurse practitioner (NP) practice is one kind of advanced nursing practice receiving attention currently, with a view to developing consistent educational and regulatory approaches. Consistency is needed to enhance the mobility and flexibility of these important healthcare provider resources in time of shortages. This paper describes how the regulatory body in British Columbia decided to register only three categories of NP: family/all ages, adult and pediatrics. It describes the state of NP regulation when the work began, the consultation process used in coming to this decision and the principles underlying the decision. Regulators, educators and administrators may benefit from understanding the issues and reasoning presented. Literature to guide this work was lacking, a gap this paper addresses to help inform decision-making in other settings and contexts. Dialogue about this approach may facilitate movement towards consistent approaches to the regulation, education and deployment of NPs in Canada and elsewhere.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12927/cjnl.2010.21596

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Publications led by, commissioned by, or involving regulators typically focus specifically on regulatory standards, processes, and reforms.

    “In contrast, publications led by, commissioned by, or involving regulators typically focus specifically on regulatory standards, processes, and reforms [34,37,49,51,56,61,64,65,75,76,87–90,142,157,163,164,168,174,176,177], reflecting the topics that nursing regulators likely find more relevant in guiding their work.”

    From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

  • Advanced practice nursing regulation has been driven by advocacy efforts led by non-regulator researchers aiming to reduce barriers to practice.

    “while advanced practice nursing regulation has been driven by advocacy efforts led by non-regulator researchers aiming to reduce barriers to practice [31–35,63,92,104,106,146–150,162,169–171,179,202–204].”

    From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wearing, J., Black, J., & Kline, K.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Nursing leadership
Published
2010-03-18
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
40-49
ISSN
  • 1481-9643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1929-6355
OpenAlex
W2170965460
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing leadership (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Law › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Keywords
nurse practitioner regulation, advanced practice nursing, professional registration, family nurse practitioners, pediatric nurse practitioners, scope of practice, nursing education requirements, regulatory decision-making, British Columbia, labor mobility, health workforce shortage
MeSH terms
British Columbia, Canada, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Patient Care, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Safety, Specialty Boards, Models, Nursing, Government Regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review