The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practice Support Initiatives That Contribute to the Regulation of Registered Nurses and Nurse Practitioners
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Publications led by, commissioned by, or involving regulators typically focus specifically on regulatory standards, processes, and reforms.
“In contrast, publications led by, commissioned by, or involving regulators typically focus specifically on regulatory standards, processes, and reforms [34,37,49,51,56,61,64,65,75,76,87–90,142,157,163,164,168,174,176,177], reflecting the topics that nursing regulators likely find more relevant in guiding their work.”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
s.p.a, A. (2013) · Cited by 1,292
Wearing, J., Black, J., & Kline, K. (2010) · Nursing leadership · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2010.21596 · Cited by 9
Trends and Challenges in Regulating Nursing Practice Today
Saver, C. (2010) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(15)30359-8 · Cited by 7
Confronting the Realities of Regulation in a New Age of Practice
Porter‐O’Grady, T. (2010) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(15)30343-4 · Cited by 5
Making the standards come alive.
Brunke, L. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 2
Brunke, L. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review
Chiu, P., Thiessen, N. J., Idrees, S., Leslie, K., & Kung, J. Y. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323716 · Cited by 12
“%) scholarly and grey literature sources were sorted into this category [4,34,36–38, 40,44– 46, 49 , 51 ,53, 55,56, 61, 64, 65, 67,70,75 ,76 Regulatory structures, processes and outcomes.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, S.
- Corresponding author
- Foster, Sandra
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Regulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 19-25
- ISSN
- 2155-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104712571
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Regulation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Regulation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Keywords
- practice support, nursing regulation, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, standards of practice, professional practice, public protection, ethical practice, British Columbia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
