The Forgotten: The challenges faced by francophone nursing candidates following the introduction of the NCLEX-RN in Canada
Abstract
In 2015, the traditional paper-and-pencil entry-to-practice exam in Canada was replaced by a computer-adaptive testing exam, the American National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN). As there are two official languages in Canada - English and French - the NCLEX-RN was translated to French. Although initially the pass rates for anglophone writers with the NCLEX-RN were lower than with the previous Canadian licensing exam, their pass rates have now increased. By contrast, francophone writers have continued to have lower pass rates, and a decreasing number of candidates are choosing to write the exam in French. A lack of access to French language preparatory resources is being reported by francophone graduates as one of the contributing factors. Canadian nursing regulators report that they are not responsible for ensuring that candidates have access to preparatory materials. However, given the bilingual culture and heritage in Canada, there is a responsibility to ensure equitable access to preparatory resources to ensure success on the licensing exam. This paper raises alarm about the decreasing number of francophone graduates writing the NCLEX-RN in French and the ongoing delivery of safe, quality nursing care to francophone patients by nurses proficient in the French language.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The NCLEX-RN entry-to-practice exam sparked controversy within the profession, generating significant attention from non-regulator scholars.
“For example, the NCLEX-RN entry-to-practice exam sparked controversy within the profession, generating significant attention from non-regulator scholars [66,68,71–73,77,80,97,98,100,123,124,126,167,217]”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review
Chiu, P., Thiessen, N. J., Idrees, S., Leslie, K., & Kung, J. Y. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323716 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“For example, the NCLEX-RN entry-to-practice exam sparked controversy within the profession, generating significant attention from non-regulator scholars [66,68,71– 73, 77, 80, Nearly half of the scholarly sources (n = 87, 44.6”
InfluentialNCLEX‐RN© preparation resources available online in French: An integrative review
Lalonde, M., Prairie, G., Vanderspank‐Wright, B., et al. (2021) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.12705 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationA critical autobiographical narrative inquiry of coming to terms with the NCLEX-RN
Ewers, K. (2021) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Strategies Used in Canadian Nursing Programs to Prepare Students for NCLEX-RN® Licensure Exam
Gibbons, C., Shamputa, I. C., Le, M., & McCloskey, R. M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11040613
“With few exceptions [8–10], the literature about the NCLEX-RN® in Canada has largely focused on the challenges associated with transitioning to a new licensure exam and the lack of consultation with nursing education leaders about the adoption of the exam [2,11,12].”
BackgroundTyerman, J., & Bailey, L. (2025) · Revue Francophone Internationale de Recherche Infirmière · doi:10.1016/j.refiri.2025.100373
Dietetic Workforce Development in Canada and Australia: Towards a Critical Policy Approach
Fox, A., & Palermo, C. E. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research · doi:10.3148/cjdpr-2026-005
"Outsourcing Accreditation of Dietetics Education: Why a National Conversation Is Needed".
Fox, A., & Lordly, D. (2026) · Canadian journal of dietetic practice and research · doi:10.3148/cjdpr-2026-007
- Authors
- Lalonde, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lalonde, Michelle
- ORCID
- Lalonde, Michelle
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership
- Publisher
- Longwoods Publishing
- Published
- 2019-12-31
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 66-73
- ISSN
- 1481-9643 (ISSN-L)
- 1929-6355
- OpenAlex
- W3008550018
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing leadership (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- NCLEX-RN, nursing licensure examination, language barriers, computerized adaptive testing, exam pass rates, bilingualism, nursing regulation
- MeSH terms
- Canada, Communication Barriers, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Licensure, Nursing, Students, Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review