Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 758

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Thermodynamics of Black Holes

Open access
Wald, Robert M.·2001·Living Reviews in Relativity
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2001-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We review the present status of black hole thermodynamics. Our review includes discussion of classical black hole thermodynamics, Hawking radiation from black holes, the generalized second law, and the issue of entropy bounds. A brief survey also is given of approaches to the calculation of black hole entropy. We conclude with a discussion of some unresolved open issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12942/lrr-2001-6

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Cited by

See all 758

Metadata

Authors
Wald, R. M.
Venue
Living Reviews in Relativity
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-07-09
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
6-6
ISSN
  • 1433-8351 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-3613
DOI
10.12942/lrr-2001-6
OpenAlex
W2081528567
Cited by
758
References
82
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Thermodynamics of Black Holes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12942/lrr-2001-6
The paper
Wald, R. M. (2001). The Thermodynamics of Black Holes. Living Reviews in Relativity. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2001-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.