Cited by 73Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyMedia and Digital Communication

A Qualitative Study on the Reasons for Social Media Addiction

Open access
Aksoy, Mehmet Emin·2018·European Journal of Educational Research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the causes of social media addiction of individuals, who define themselves as social media addicts, in a clearer and more concrete way. In order to achieve this aim, participants have been tested with an addiction test, and 25 university students who perceive themselves as social media addicts were selected for the study. The findings of the research showed that participants' reasons for using social media were lack of friends, social necessity of social media, feeling of fulfillment, fear of missing out, intertwining of social media and daily life. The study also pointed out that social media addiction has a beginning and a continuity phase. It has been shown that the individuals who were in the beginning phase tended to start using social media for reasons such as not being able to find friends, lack of socialization, and monotony of life. In the continuity stage of individual addiction, they stated that they use social media for reasons such as, fulfilling a duty, and protecting social relations that they had. One of the reasons for addiction was the need to socialize, while male participants were more interested in acquiring new friends, female participants were more interested in communicating with their real life friends.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.861

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Arpacı, I. (2011). Kamu kurumlarında teknolojik inovasyon ve inovasyon politikası [Technological innovation and innovation policy in public institutions.]. METU Studies in Development, 38(2), 111-123.
  2. Arpaci, I. (2013). Organizational adoption of mobile communication technologies (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Information System, School of Informatics, Middle East Technical University.
  3. Glesne, C. (2010). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction, 4th ed. Boston: Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aksoy, M. E.
Affiliations
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Aksoy, Mehmet Emin
Venue
European Journal of Educational Research
Published
2018-10-15
Volume
volume-7-2018
Issue
volume7-issue4.html
Pages
861-865
ISSN
2165-8714 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2926575001
Cited by
73
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • European Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social media addiction, motivations for social media use, university students, socialization, fear of missing out, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review