Cited by 40Aging and Gerontology ResearchRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Clarifying the Measurement of Activity

Ritchey, Lynn Harper, Ritchey, Lynn Harper, Dietz, Bernadette E.·2001·Activities, Adaptation & Aging

Abstract

We present an analysis of activity theory of aging, examine the effects of activity on psychological well-being, and explore alternative conceptualizations of activity to determine appropriate future directions. We relate individual activity items to measures of psycholog ical well-being to determine whether these items display the expected theoretical association with psychological well-being. Then we compare a model in which solitary, informal, and formal activities have additive effects on well-being with two models in which these activity types in teract to influence measures of well-being as predicted by activity the ory. Many activity items are not significantly related to some measures of well-being. In addition, the influence of activity type on well-being is not increased by allowing for unique combinations of activity types. We find little utility in differentiating activities by type. Our findings imply that psychological well-being is influenced by activities representing a mobile lifestyle that includes a sense of control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j016v26n01_01

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ritchey, Ritchey and Dietz (2001) found that informal social activities positively influenced the greatest number of wellbeing measures among nine separate measures.

    “Ritchey, Ritchey and Dietz (2001) used nine separate measures for different aspects of wellbeing to show that informal social activities positively influenced the greatest number of wellbeing measures.”

    From A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life (2011) · cites this paper as Ritchey, Ritchey and Dietz (2001)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritchey, L. H., Ritchey, L. H., & Dietz, B. E.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
Activities, Adaptation & Aging
Published
2001-09
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 0192-4788 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-4368
OpenAlex
W2037331527
Cited by
40
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Activities Adaptation & Aging (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
psychological well-being, older adults, leisure, solitary activities, informal practices, activity types, perceived control, mobile lifestyle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review