International and Local Student Satisfaction: Resources and Capabilities Perspective
Abstract
In this paper, we develop a conceptual model for assessing student satisfaction with universities and the likelihood of students recommending their institutions to other prospective students. Student satisfaction is conceptualised as a mediator between resources and capabilities and recommendation. The resources and capabilities that contribute to student satisfaction are identified as teaching, learning, technology, library, student services and student orientation. The resource needs of local and international students are compared. The data are analysed through path modelling, which results in a holistic perspective of the relationships. The findings suggest that more resources are required to satisfy local students than foreign students-that is, that local students perceive a larger pool of resources to be important for their satisfaction while foreign students appear to require a smaller pool. The implications of the study for university administrators are discussed and areas for future research are suggested.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students who actively participate in co-creation initiatives take full responsibility for their learning and use teachers and other resources to help them succeed.
“Students who actively participate in co-creation initiatives 'take full responsibility for their learning and use teachers and other resources to help them succeed' (Mavondo et al., 2004, p. 46; Zarandi et al., 2022, p. 1299).”
From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Mavondo et al., 2004
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334 · see citing works
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494 · see citing works
Gremler, D. D., & McCollough, M. A. (2002) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/027753024002008 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment design through co-creation
Williams, A., & Ingle, E. (2025) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5802 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mavondo, F. T., Tsarenko, Y., & Gabbott, M.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing for Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-11-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-60
- ISSN
- 0884-1241 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7144
- OpenAlex
- W2089416852
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Keywords
- student satisfaction, international students, local students, university recommendation, resources and capabilities, higher education marketing, student support services, student orientation, teaching-learning process, library services, student technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review