Cited by 93Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyEvaluation of Teaching PracticesManagement and Marketing Education

Student Satisfaction Guarantees: An Empirical Examination of Attitudes, Antecedents, and Consequences

Gremler, Dwayne D., McCollough, Michael A.·2002·Journal of Marketing Education

Abstract

In guaranteeing the satisfaction of undergraduate students with the instructor’s performance, Gremler and McCollough in previous studies reported that undergraduate studentsgen erally approve of the concept of offering a student satisfaction guarantee for a course. Although they provided both qualitative and quantitative measures of students’attitudes concerning the guarantee, left unresolved is how students’ attitudes toward the guarantee might possibly affect their attitudes toward their overall classroom experience, including their attitude of the instructor’s efforts, their own efforts, and their satisfaction with classroom learning outcomes. This research presents and empirically evaluates a student satisfaction guarantee model. Lessons learned have implications not only for student satisfaction guarantees but for service guarantees in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/027753024002008

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gremler, D. D., & McCollough, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
Venue
Journal of Marketing Education
Published
2002-08
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
150-160
ISSN
  • 0273-4753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6550
OpenAlex
W2018693602
Cited by
93
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Management and Marketing Education
Keywords
student attitudes, instructor performance, classroom experience, service guarantees, undergraduate students, antecedents of satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review