Cited by 35Behavioral and Psychological StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEmployee Performance and Motivation

The Use of Concurrent Schedules to Evaluate the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on "Intrinsic Motivation"

Mawhinney, Thomas C., Dickinson, Alyce M., Taylor, Lewis A.·1989·Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

Abstract

Contingent rewards have been criticized on the grounds that they may decrease intrinsic motivation. Behaviorally, when extrinsic rewards are provided for an activity maintained by instrinsic task rewards, behavior may come under the control of the extrinsic rewards and control by the intrinsic rewards may be weakened. Further, it is claimed that the extrinsic rewards may decrease the reinforcing value of the intrinsic rewards so that performance decreases once the extrinsic rewards are terminated. In previous research, the effects of extrinsic rewards have been assessed by observing performance following reward termination. In the current study, concurrent schedules were used to determine the extent to which behavior was controlled by the extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards during reward administration. For the two subjects whose preferred activities were competency-based, control by intrinsic rewards was not decreased by extrinsic rewards. For the subject whose preferred activity was chance-based, performance came under the control of the extrinsic rewards. The extrinsic rewards did not weaken the reinforcing value of the intrinsic rewards for any of the subjects following reward termination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j075v10n01_07

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mawhinney, T. C., Dickinson, A. M., & Taylor, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Detroit Mercy (US)
  • Western Michigan University (US)
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management
Published
1989-03-29
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
109-129
ISSN
  • 0160-8061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8604
OpenAlex
W2010401716
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
Keywords
extrinsic rewards, intrinsic motivation, contingent reward, concurrent schedules, reinforcement value, behavioral control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review