The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Family Environment as a Predictor of Adjustment to Metastatic Breast Carcinoma
Abstract
The effects of family environment on the psychological adjustment of 54 women with metastatic carcinoma of the breast were studied over a one-year period. Family environment was assessed using the Family Environment Scale (FES) and a descriptive checklist, and adjustment was measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Patients described their families as supportive and relatively free of conflict, and their spouses or other family members agreed moderately with them. Patient mood disturbance during the year was made the dependent variable in a stepwise multiple regression analysis, with FES subscale scores at the beginning of the year and other control variables as predictors. Better adjustment was found to be predicted by more expressiveness and less conflict and moral-religious orientation in the family. These findings are presented as evidence that the family is a crucial factor in patient adjustment, and that 'conspiracies of silence' in the family may be harmful. A clinical illustration is presented.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Of the 178 studies with the highest methodological rigor, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships [124–135] and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression [136–148].”
From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [132]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications
Koenig, H. G. (2012) · ISRN Psychiatry · doi:10.5402/2012/278730 · Cited by 2,423
“%) found positive relationships with depression [136–148].”
Religion and spirituality: Linkages to physical health.
Powell, L. H., Shahabi, L., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.36 · Cited by 1,093
Religious involvement and mortality: A meta-analytic review.
McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., Larson, D. B., Koenig, H. G., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.211 · Cited by 1,115
Breitbart, W. (2002) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s005200100289 · Cited by 466
Religiosity/Spirituality and Mortality
Chida, Y., Steptoe, A., & Powell, L. H. (2009) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000190791 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiegel, D., Bloom, J. R., & Gottheil, E.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Spiegel, David
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1983-04-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-44
- ISSN
- 0734-7332 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7586
- OpenAlex
- W2041805273
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychosocial Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Support in Illness
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- family environment, metastatic breast cancer, psychological adjustment, mood disturbance, family conflict, family expressiveness, Family Environment Scale, Profile of Mood States, women with cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review