Cited by 12Educational Assessment and PedagogyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Extending Curriculum-Based Measurement into Middle/Secondary Schools: The Technical Adequacy of the Concept Maze

Twyman, Todd, Tindal, Gerald·2007·Journal of Applied School Psychology

Abstract

Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) is emerging at middle/secondary school settings. The purpose of mis study was to investigate the reliability of a concept maze task to assist middle school teachers in making accurate decisions regarding student content learning. A total sample of 240 middle-school students were randomly assigned to take a traditional maze or two different variations of the concept maze (examples or attributes). Results indicated that the concept maze using attributes as options was more difficult and more stable relative to the other two types of mazes. Alternate form and test-retest analyses of the concept mazes resulted in moderate correlations. Results are discussed in the context of extending CBM into middle and secondary classrooms as a tool that teachers can use to monitor the learning progress of their students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j370v24n01_03

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The concept-based approach leads to assessments that take advantage of constructed responses with explicit guidelines for partial credit-scoring algorithm.

    “Furthermore, the concept-based approach leads to assessments that take advantage of constructed responses with explicit guidelines for a partial credit-scoring algorithm [177].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Adams M. J., 1990, Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print
  2. Airasian P. W., 1991, Classroom Assessment
  3. 1999, Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
  4. Baker S. K., 1998, What Reading Research Tells Us About Children with Diverse Learning Needs: Bases and Basics, 183
  5. 10.1207/s1532690xci0602_1 · DOI
  6. Deno S. L., 1985, Exceptional Children, 52, 219, 10.1177/001440298505200303 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dorr-Bremme D. W., 1986, Assessing Student Achievement: A Profile of Classroom Practices
  8. 10.1177/074193259301400610 · DOI
  9. Espin C. A., 1994, Diagnostique, 20, 121
  10. Espin C. A., 1996, Exceptional Children, 62, 497, 10.1177/001440299606200602 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Espin C. A., 1998, Advanced Applications of Curriculum-Based Measurement, 214
  12. 10.1177/00222194050380041301 · DOI
  13. 10.1207/s15324818ame0601_2 · DOI
  14. Fuchs L. S., 2004, School Psychology Review, 33, 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086241 · DOI
  15. Fuchs L. S., 1993, School Psychology Review, 22
  16. 10.1177/00224669020360020501 · DOI
  17. Hollenbeck K., 1996, Diagnostique, 21, 37, 10.1177/073724779602100403 · DOI
  18. Howell K., 2000, Curriculum-Based Evaluation: Teaching and Decision-Making
  19. 10.1177/073724770302800305 · DOI
  20. Ketterlin-Geller L. R., Assessment for Effective Intervention
  21. Klausmeier H. J., 1990, Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, 93
  22. 10.1177/074193259902000102 · DOI
  23. 2000, Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction
  24. 10.1177/002246699402800204 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1037/1082-989X.5.3.343 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/002246699202600205 · DOI
  27. Shinn M. R., 1998, Advanced Applications of Curriculum-Based Measurement
  28. Tindal G., 1990, Classroom-based Assessment: Evaluating Instructional Outcomes
  29. Tindal G., 1992, Focus on Teaching and Learning in Content Classes
  30. Tindal G., 1995, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 72
  31. Twyman T., 2003, Effects of a conceptually framed, problem/solution/effect graphic organizer on content comprehension and problem solving skills for seventh grade social studies students
  32. Twyman T., 2005, Extending curriculum-based measurement in the middle/secondary schools: The technical adequacy of the concept maze
  33. 10.1080/15235882.2003.10162806 · DOI
  34. Twyman T., 2004, Exploring a concept-based instructional approach to increase geography achievement for at-risk students and students with disabilities
  35. Twyman T., 2004, Using concepts to frame history content

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Twyman, T., & Tindal, G.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied School Psychology
Published
2007-09-25
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
49-67
ISSN
  • 0739-9820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-7903
  • 1537-7911
OpenAlex
W1995249830
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied School Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
curriculum-based measurement, junior high school students, high school students, test-retest reliability, alternate form reliability, student progress monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review