Cited by 3Health Policy Implementation ScienceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesClinical practice guidelines implementation

Initial Steps Taken by Nine Primary Care Practices to Implement Alcohol Screening Guidelines with Hypertensive Patients: The AA-TRIP Project

Miller, Peter M., Stockdell, Ruth, Nemeth, Lynne, Feifer, Chris, Jenkins, Ruth G., Liszka, Heather, Ornstein, Steven, Nietert, Paul J. +1 more·2006·Substance Abuse

Abstract

Many medical conditions are caused or exacerbated by heavy drinking, necessitating alcohol screening and discussion in primary care practices. This is particularly true of hypertension, the most common primary diagnosis in the United States, which has been linked to the regular consumption of 3 or more standard alcoholic beverages a day. The Accelerating Alcohol Screening-Translating Research into Practice (AA-TRIP) project was designed to improve detection and management of alcohol problems in primary care patients with hypertension. Medical providers are being trained using the Practice Partner Research Network's-Translating Research into Practice (PPRNet-TRIP) quality improvement model. This includes a multi-method intervention (electronic medical records, on-site academic detailing, practice feedback reports and annual network meetings) to help practices increase adherence to clinical guidelines. Qualitative analyses of initial steps taken by nine primary care practices toward the routine implementation of alcohol screening guidelines are presented. Organizational factors and provider and patient characteristics all influenced the method and consistency of alcohol screening and intervention. Perceived time constraints, patient sensitivity to questions about alcohol, and possible stigma associated with a diagnosis of alcoholism were also relevant barriers requiring problem solving.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j465v27n01_08

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, P. M., Stockdell, R., Nemeth, L., Feifer, C., Jenkins, R. G., Liszka, H., Ornstein, S., Nietert, P. J., & Wessell, A.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Substance Abuse
Published
2006-08
Volume
27
Issue
1-2
Pages
61-70
ISSN
  • 0889-7077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0164
OpenAlex
W1845985823
Cited by
1
References
2
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Substance Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • Substance Abuse
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R25AA015066)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
alcohol screening, hypertension, guideline implementation, primary care practices, alcoholism, barriers to screening, time constraints, academic detailing, electronic health records, quality improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review