Initial Steps Taken by Nine Primary Care Practices to Implement Alcohol Screening Guidelines with Hypertensive Patients: The AA-TRIP Project
Abstract
Many medical conditions are caused or exacerbated by heavy drinking, necessitating alcohol screening and discussion in primary care practices. This is particularly true of hypertension, the most common primary diagnosis in the United States, which has been linked to the regular consumption of 3 or more standard alcoholic beverages a day. The Accelerating Alcohol Screening-Translating Research into Practice (AA-TRIP) project was designed to improve detection and management of alcohol problems in primary care patients with hypertension. Medical providers are being trained using the Practice Partner Research Network's-Translating Research into Practice (PPRNet-TRIP) quality improvement model. This includes a multi-method intervention (electronic medical records, on-site academic detailing, practice feedback reports and annual network meetings) to help practices increase adherence to clinical guidelines. Qualitative analyses of initial steps taken by nine primary care practices toward the routine implementation of alcohol screening guidelines are presented. Organizational factors and provider and patient characteristics all influenced the method and consistency of alcohol screening and intervention. Perceived time constraints, patient sensitivity to questions about alcohol, and possible stigma associated with a diagnosis of alcoholism were also relevant barriers requiring problem solving.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More time per consultation, more experience in delivering brief interventions, and simplifying the screening process were reported as facilitators.
“More time per consultation, more experience in delivering brief interventions and simplifying the screening process (e.g. short and simple screening tools, giving patients self-report questionnaires) are examples of reported facilitators [39, 43, 93, 97].”
GPs and nurses often cited improving professional teamwork as a facilitator.
“GPs and nurses often cited improving professional teamwork (e.g. having a practice nurse delivering SBI, having receptionists giving patients screening tools) as a facilitator [39, 41, 54, 70, 71, 73, 76, 80, 91, 93, 97, 99].”
Increasing experience with screening and normalizing alcohol questions were reported as facilitators.
“Increasing experience with screening and normalizing alcohol questions were reported as facilitators [93].”
More time per consultation, more experience in delivering brief interventions, and simpler screening processes were reported as facilitators.
“More time per consultation [39, 70, 80, 92, 97], more experience in delivering brief interventions [93], and simpler screening processes (e.g. short and simple screening tools, giving patients self-report questionnaires) [39] were reported as facilitators.”
Cites
Moyer, A., Finney, J. W., Swearingen, C. E., & Vergun, P. (2002) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00018.x · Cited by 1,092 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Numerous investigators have highlighted the importance of early identification of alcoholusedisorders inprimaryhealthcare(Anderson et al. 1993; Moyer et al. 2002).”
BackgroundBarry, K. L., Blow, F. C., Willenbring, M., McCormick, R., Brockmann, L. M., & Visnic, S. (2004) · Substance Abuse · doi:10.1300/j465v25n01_05 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rosário, F., Santos, M. I., Angus, K., Pas, L., Ribeiro, C., & Fitzgerald, N. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01073-0 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“short and simple screening tools, giving patients self-report questionnaires) are examples of reported facilitators [39, 43, 93, 97].”
BackgroundInfluentialNygaard, P., & Aasland, O. G. (2011) · Alcohol and Alcoholism · doi:10.1093/alcalc/agq073 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Hanschmidt, F., Manthey, J., Kraus, L., Scafato, E., Gual, A., Grimm, C., & Rehm, J. (2017) · Alcohol and Alcoholism · doi:10.1093/alcalc/agx032 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Miller, P. M., Stockdell, R., Nemeth, L., Feifer, C., Jenkins, R. G., Liszka, H., Ornstein, S., Nietert, P. J., & Wessell, A.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Substance Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 61-70
- ISSN
- 0889-7077 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-0164
- OpenAlex
- W1845985823
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Substance Abuse (publishedVersion)
- Substance Abuse
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R25AA015066)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- alcohol screening, hypertension, guideline implementation, primary care practices, alcoholism, barriers to screening, time constraints, academic detailing, electronic health records, quality improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review