Cited by 77Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Barriers to Implementing Screening and Brief Interventions in General Practice: Findings from a Qualitative Study in Norway

Nygaard, P., Aasland, O. G.·2011·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: The qualitative component of this mixed methods study aimed at obtaining more in-depth information about the barriers of implementation of screening and brief interventions (SBI) in general practice identified in the quantitative component by giving general practitioners (GPs) the opportunity to discuss and report on the particular difficulties they experience in relation to identification and treatment of alcohol problems in their daily work. METHODS: Focus-group interviews were performed with seven groups of GPs in different parts of Norway, encompassing 40 participants. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the QDA Miner software. RESULTS: The analysis revealed five major groups of factors influencing GPs' reluctance to use SBI for alcohol problems: (a) perception of alcohol problems, (b) integration of SBI into existing routines, (c) prevention vs. treatment, (d) structural issues and (e) the relationship between practitioner and patient. DISCUSSION: The analysis showed that problems of implementing SBI in general practice are a complex issue. The quantitative part of the project revealed a strong association between knowledge/self-efficacy and the use of SBI. However, in the qualitative study, we were able to look in more detail at some of the findings from the first part. Even if the lack of knowledge of SBI was still significant, the five factors identified in this study appeared important for the GPs' decisions to use SBI in individual cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agq073

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Saunders JB, Aasland OG (1987) WHO collaborative project on identification and treatment of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Report on phase I: development of a screening instrument. Geneva, WHO/MNH/DAT/86.3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nygaard, P., & Aasland, O. G.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Nygaard, P.
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2010-11-08
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
52-60
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2172041510
Cited by
77
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
screening and brief intervention, alcohol problems, general practitioners, implementation barriers, alcohol screening, alcohol treatment, prevention versus treatment, practitioner-patient relationship, self-efficacy, primary care
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Norway, Psychotherapy, Brief, Substance Abuse Detection, Focus Groups, Self Efficacy, Qualitative Research, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review